822
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by uberstar@lemmy.ml to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

Some of the LinkedIn Responses are direct and on-point, and also hilariously/depressingly based depending on how you look at it:

EDIT: In hindsight, I think I should've looked into posting this in a different community.. It's closer to a silly "innovation".. soo.. is this considered FUD? I also don't support smoking or vaping, especially among kids. Original title had "privacy-violating" before the "solution".

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] obinice@lemmy.world 88 points 11 months ago

How is this invading someone's privacy? All it's doing is detecting if children are smoking in a room or space at school and then putting an alert up about the detection on a screen.

They have zero right to privately smoke at school, or anywhere for that matter, smoking is illegal for children and not something to be taken lightly.

Similarly, adults have no right to privately smoke whilst in the workplace in the bathroom or other non-smoking designated areas. This is also illegal and not to be taken lightly.

[-] Schlemmy@lemmy.ml 47 points 11 months ago

I agree. These are anonymous messages. I don't see any privacy violations.

They could set up camera's that record who's entering and leaving the restroom and thus violate privacy but this seems fair play to me. They'll just vape somewhere else.

[-] TrousersMcPants@lemmy.world 31 points 11 months ago

They're not anonymous tho, the image very clearly labels who's desk the vaping was detected at

[-] SmoothLiquidation@lemmy.world 73 points 11 months ago

It says “Simon’s desk” which is the name of the guy making the post, which to me says he was testing the software from his desk.

When it is deployed, it would say “vaping detected in north stairwell” or whatever. They are not installing sensors on every desk.

[-] Schlemmy@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 months ago

Simon's desk probably refers to a location, not actually the desk of Simon.

[-] exanime@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago

How is this invading someone's privacy?

So you think they will not use this to try to identify the vaping student?

[-] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 28 points 11 months ago

So you think we should all be allowed to smoke in non-smoking places? The school already has all info on all it's kids, what else "private" is being revealed here? If you break the rules of the establishment where you are, they'll try to identify and ban you, because that's how private property and bylaws work. School is no different. If you break the rules you face the consequences.

Is this logical and useful? No. Does it help kids become better and learn? No. Will it actually reduce vaping? No, it's a leaderboard now.

But is it invading privacy? Also no. It is enforcing nonsensical draconic rules, but not revealing any information that wouldn't be already known or demanded by the institution in that situation.

[-] Bruhh@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago

Privacy isn't restricted to just your data on file. You'd expect some sort of privacy in bathrooms (I assume that's where these would be installed). It can also set a precedent. Maybe they start tracking cellphone use "ensure students are paying attention". Maybe they start tracking how often students are using the restroom, especially female students to gather data on their cycles (incredibly plausible depending on the state). Maybe they track their exact movements via school wifi. Maybe they give them laptops to spy on them at home. None of these obviously equate to one another but where does the school draw the line? Rather not have this shit in the first place.

[-] helpImTrappedOnline@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

You'd expect some sort of privacy in bathrooms

That is the whole point of this mess. The alternative is a person or camera INSIDE the bathroom at all times. The camera would be so much cheaper to deploy...but privavcy laws, rightfully, say no.

With the sensor all it does is say "smoke/vape detected", from there an adult can check the hall cam to see who went in or just go right in to catch the kid.

I assume with the monitor, it makes it easy for a teacher sitting outside the bathroom and can see the popup (in some schools they already have them to check passes and listen for screeming)

[-] exanime@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

So you think we should all be allowed to smoke in non-smoking places?

No, but I see you need to make up a point I didn't make so you could attack that.

Lazy strawman, you must be from reddit

[-] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 9 points 11 months ago

Oh the irony. Lol.

[-] oatscoop@midwest.social 15 points 11 months ago

.... good?

Everyone (even kids) have a reasonable expectation of privacy, but children using drugs in school isn't something that falls under that reasonable expectation of privacy.

[-] exanime@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago

Considering they are only harming themselves, no I do not care much

As others mentioned, I think schools should dedicate resources to address this situation through education, instead of paying some start up for some surveillance gadgets

[-] Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 11 months ago

They are not just harming themselves. Everyone knows how harmful secondhand smoke is.

[-] exanime@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

From vaping? I think you have vaping and smoking confused

[-] Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 11 months ago

Nope, not smoke per se, but still damaging to breathe.

I think people severely underestimate how harmful it is.

[-] exanime@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

Happy to read about it of you have any source to share

I know vaping is not without dangers but it is a step forward from smoking. I honestly never read anything about second hand vaping fumes

In any case, I am not in favour of vaping in schools. I just think schools should not spend money in these detector crap. They should address it with their best tool, education

[-] oatscoop@midwest.social 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Considering they are only harming themselves

Again, we're talking about actual children. You know: people that have yet to mentally develop to the point where they can make fully informed decisions on everything and sometimes have to be "coerced" by reasonable adults into doing so.

[-] exanime@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

So you didn't read my second paragraph?

[-] oatscoop@midwest.social 2 points 11 months ago

I didn't disagree with that part. Doing what you suggested and using the "vape detectors" aren't mutually exclusive.

[-] exanime@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Doing what you suggested and using the “vape detectors” aren’t mutually exclusive.

Well, kind of since I suggested NOT using vape detectors

[-] DempstersBox@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Ding ding ding

[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago

They ought to use it that way if they aren't. Privacy does not mean "flagrant ability to flout rules or laws"

[-] Kit 10 points 11 months ago

Yeah, we have similar sensors at my job. I work in a highly secured facility and smoke/vape detectors are installed in all the bathrooms. It makes the fire alarm go off if detected.

[-] DempstersBox@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago
[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago

Is that what we call people who are obviously right now?

[-] potpotato@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

Those things are generally not illegal.

It’s illegal to buy/sell tobacco as/to a minor. It’s not illegal to use tobacco.

Most of the restrictions on smoking are not by law, but policy. 12 states don’t have any sort of ban on tobacco use.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

You do get that smoking and vaping are the different things right?

[-] xthexder@l.sw0.com 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Vaping is not the same as smoking and can be done perfectly safely with no drugs involved at all (i.e. flavor only vapes). It's barely different than inhaling steam.

Edit: I'm willing to admit when I'm wrong, and now think "relatively safely" is a better way of putting this. There's a few concerns that I'm perfectly happy to live with as an adult, but I get that kids won't have spent as much time trying to understand the risks.

[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Imagine defending child vaping 🤮

[-] FinalRemix@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

Lotta Juul fanboys in these comments...

[-] CondensedPossum@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

pretty wild you can still type with that boot in your mouth. how do you see around it? do you just touch type?

[-] Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 11 months ago

I see critical thinking is not your cup of tea. Might want to take that boot out of your ass.

this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2024
822 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

40451 readers
302 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS