617
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] cheddar@programming.dev 5 points 3 months ago

What's the rationality behind this?

[-] hex@programming.dev 14 points 3 months ago

Industrialised meat is a nightmare...?

[-] cheddar@programming.dev 3 points 3 months ago

How's this rational? That's an emotional evaluation. I'm not even arguing with that. But that's not the point of the discussion.

[-] hex@programming.dev 13 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Maybe "nightmare" is too subjective/emotional. But it's undeniably unsustainable, inhumane, barbaric and outdated. We know better is the biggest issue. We don't need to treat our food that way.

(P.S. I'm not vegan, I'm just full of cognitive dissonance lol)

[-] cheddar@programming.dev 2 points 3 months ago

That's never been the point of this discussion, stop flaming. That's just toxic.

[-] hex@programming.dev 8 points 3 months ago

I'm flaming? Sorry, just was trying to point out that becoming vegan can be more than just an emotional choice.

[-] cogman@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago

Meat production is a prime contributor to climate change. Large amounts of resources go into raising meat. Further, cattle and pig production (not so much chicken) is the prime pathway to food contamination. Whenever you see lettuce recalls because of e. coli, that's because animal shit got mixed in with the lettuce or the water for the lettuce.

Choosing not to eat meat because of these facts seems like a pretty rational choice, no emotion involved.

[-] cheddar@programming.dev 2 points 3 months ago

Oh boy, why are you arguing about things that you clearly don't understand? "Veganism is a philosophy and way of living which seeks to exclude—as far as is possible and practicable—all forms of exploitation of, and cruelty to, animals for food, clothing or any other purpose." Veganism doesn't care about climate. People don't go vegan to save climate. Some adopt a plant-based diet though, but these are separate bubbles that just barely intersect.

[-] cogman@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago

Got it, so you are emotionally defining veganism in such a way that you aren't actually vegan if you don't get there for emotional reasons.

If that's your definition of veganism then of course nobody can get there with reason. You've created a tautology with your emotion filled definition.

For the record, veganism is defined by MW as

: a strict vegetarian who consumes no food (such as meat, eggs, or dairy products) that comes from animals

also : one who abstains from using animal products (such as leather)

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/vegan

That was the definition I was operating under. Sorry I didn't Intuit your arbitrary definition you pulled from "eat meat.com" or whatever you got it.

[-] Resonosity@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

They got that definition from The Vegan Society, the leading charity/group representing the movement.

[-] cheddar@programming.dev 2 points 3 months ago

Ah yes, merriam webster, the most informed and accurate source on the subject of veganism lol. The fact that you don't know where my definition comes from tells everything one needs to know about your involvement in the community 🤷‍♂️

[-] cogman@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Here's a quote from the site you cherry picked

Some people may choose to go vegan, for some it may be because they do not believe in farmed animal practices and animal exploitation, for others it may be due to environmental concerns. Whatever the reason The Vegan Society is here to support everyone on their vegan journey.

Gee, looks like the vegan society also recognizes some people become vegan because of climate change... Or maybe you are going to redefine more terms so you can win your argument.

[-] cogman@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

Or maybe you are pulling a definition not commonly accepted by the community or English speakers. No, that can't be right, you are obviously smarter than I am. After all, you are a rational person that'd never engage in strawman attacks.

[-] erin 8 points 3 months ago

Dude, what are you on about. Plenty of vegans I know go vegan because it's better for the environment. That's a big part of why I'm vegetarian. Why make it such an "us and them" dilemma? They're just people, even if you don't ascribe to their choices. It seems like you're more concerned about being right than being correct.

[-] cheddar@programming.dev 1 points 3 months ago

Plenty of vegans I know go vegan because it's better for the environment.

I'm sorry, but you're unbelievably stupid.

[-] erin 9 points 3 months ago

Weird personal attack there. Care to explain?

[-] cogman@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

Ad hominem: check.

Don’t expect any rational choices here.

Perhaps don't cry about rationality if all you have in your brain is logical fallacies.

[-] hex@programming.dev 2 points 3 months ago

I've never seen this website before but it's absolutely hilarious to point out the other person's logical fallacy like that lol.

this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2024
617 points (100.0% liked)

memes

10696 readers
2141 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS