335
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] 133arc585@lemmy.ml 17 points 2 years ago

It follows rather directly. For it to be high treason to be against sending more military resources to Ukraine would mean that either the representatives are members of the Ukrainian government or, as was implied here, that Ukraine is a puppet state.

It's not high treason against the USA to be against the USA sending military resources to another country. You can only commit high treason against your own country.

[-] McBinary@kbin.social 29 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

You're willfully dancing around the actual point OP is making. You can't be a grown adult and think this concretely without doing so in bad faith.

The point is that opposing this is directly showing support for Russia...

[-] 133arc585@lemmy.ml 15 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

The point is that opposing this is directly showing support for Russia…

Which guess what: isn't high treason. If you'll notice, I havent offered my opinion here or participated elsewhere in the thread.

I was simply pointing out that using the term "high treason" here is rather silly and nonfactual.

[-] socsa@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

So you aren't making any argument at all, and are just saying "everyone look at my bold linguistic castle. It is very cromulent."

[-] Pacifist@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago

You should probably shut your stupid fucking mouth.

[-] VediusPollio@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

Quit acting like the average Redditor, and just be civil and disagree.

[-] klieg2323@lemmy.piperservers.net 7 points 2 years ago

Jesus Christ, not the kind of comment I'd expect from a pacifist. You come off real mature

this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2023
335 points (100.0% liked)

World News

33437 readers
331 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS