306
submitted 2 months ago by fpslem@lemmy.world to c/science@lemmy.world

MIT leaders describe the experience of not renewing its largest journal contract as overwhelmingly positive. MIT has long tried to avoid vendor lock-in through big deal contracts and, in 2019, maintained individual title-by-title subscriptions to approximately 675 Elsevier titles. In 2020, they took the significant step of canceling the full Elsevier journals contract – all 675 titles – leaving users with immediate access to only pre-2020 backfile content. Since the cancellation, MIT Libraries estimates annual savings at more than 80% of its original spend. This move saves MIT approximately $2 million each year, and the Libraries provide alternative means of access that fulfills most article requests in minutes.

After laying the groundwork with faculty and university administrators, the transition has been relatively seamless with minimal push back from researchers. Most faculty have been supportive of the Libraries in taking a principled stand in line with MIT values and are finding alternative means of access to needed research without an Elsevier subscription. Four years out, the faculty who continue to be most challenged by lack of immediate access are in the life sciences.

...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 months ago

I've heard of the name Maxwell because of the coffee...

[-] IntheTreetop@lemm.ee 3 points 2 months ago
[-] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago

That was Maxell!

[-] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 months ago

good to the last drop my subscription

this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2024
306 points (100.0% liked)

science

14786 readers
43 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

<--- rules currently under construction, see current pinned post.

2024-11-11

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS