678

It sounds way less offensive to those who decry the original terminology's problematic roots but still keeps its meaning intact.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] lud@lemm.ee 24 points 2 months ago

But POC are not the only ones that have been enslaved.

Pretty much all races and people have been enslaved in history.

Slave does not equal North American POC slave and the term in this context has absolutely nothing to do with them. The only time it refers specifically to them is when discussing North American history (and maybe current history due to the fact that USA still enslaves people in prison)

One might argue that the term is outdated because slaves are less common these days, but it has nothing to do with POC (or human slaves at all). But I won't argue that because the term is very easy to understand and thus not outdated.

[-] VulKendov@reddthat.com 19 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

North American, more specifically US slavery is very recent relative to the rest of history and was deeply ingrained into the economy of half the United States. War broke out to abolish it and the effects of it are still felt today.

Pretty much all races and people have been enslaved in history.

Don't deflect from the racism, discrimination, and prejudice that black Americans still experience to this day because of slavery.

[-] lud@lemm.ee 10 points 2 months ago

Maybe but the terms slave and master have nothing to do with that.

[-] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 months ago

Don’t deflect from the racism, discrimination, and prejudice that black Americans still experience to this day because of slavery.

hate to be that guy but like, i feel like we should probably push for more POC to enter CS education fields, or like, improve the socioeconomic status of them, or like, crack down on discriminatory hiring practices, before we like. Start removing words because they feel moderately icky and make my skin crawl.

[-] colon_capital_D@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

Why not both? We have the capacity to replace outdated/useless words and make the situation better for others. In fact, one does not prevent the other whatsoever

[-] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 months ago

that's also true. But seeing as this is a discussion primarily about removing terms from common parlance, i think it's reasonable to focus on solely that aspect.

Ultimately, i'm just not really convinced that doing this is going to be ultimately productive at the end of the day. I might be wrong i suppose. But i think i'd need to see some supporting data first.

[-] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago

That's a cool story, bro.

Completely irrelevant to the observation that descendents of slaves probably dont appreciate the terminology.

[-] lud@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

probably dont appreciate the terminology.

Exactly

this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2024
678 points (100.0% liked)

Showerthoughts

29723 readers
325 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. A showerthought should offer a unique perspective on an ordinary part of life.

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. Avoid politics
    1. NEW RULE as of 5 Nov 2024, trying it out
    2. Political posts often end up being circle jerks (not offering unique perspective) or enflaming (too much work for mods).
    3. Try c/politicaldiscussion, volunteer as a mod here, or start your own community.
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct-----

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS