847
Peer review (lemmy.world)
submitted 4 months ago by The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world to c/science_memes@mander.xyz
35 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Contramuffin@lemmy.world 13 points 4 months ago

Scientists can get really petty in peer review. They won't be able to catch if the data was manipulated or faked, but they'll be able to catch everything else. Things such as inconclusive or unconvincing data, wrongful assumptions, missing data that would complement and further prove the conclusion, or even trivial things such as a sentence being unclear.

It generally works as long as you can trust that the author isn't dishonest

[-] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

A LOT of things work without safety nets if people engage honestly.

The problem, with FAR more than science, is many, many people are distinctly NOT honest.

this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2024
847 points (100.0% liked)

Science Memes

11399 readers
464 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.

Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.

Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Sal@mander.xyz
fossilesque@mander.xyz
SciBot@mander.xyz