158
Italian uproar over judge's 10-second groping rule
(www.bbc.co.uk)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2023
158 points (100.0% liked)
Europe
8332 readers
1 users here now
News/Interesting Stories/Beautiful Pictures from Europe 🇪🇺
(Current banner: Thunder mountain, Germany, 🇩🇪 ) Feel free to post submissions for banner pictures
Rules
(This list is obviously incomplete, but it will get expanded when necessary)
- Be nice to each other (e.g. No direct insults against each other);
- No racism, antisemitism, dehumanisation of minorities or glorification of National Socialism allowed;
- No posts linking to mis-information funded by foreign states or billionaires.
Also check out !yurop@lemm.ee
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
The situation was obviously more complicated than that, the sentence was long and i have no time to explain it cause i'm not a journalist. Spreading hate falsifing and omitting is the usual anglosaxon method to attack their enemies.
Would he say
If it was an accident?
Additionally, what does
refer to? Which sentence? You can just copy it over here, people can read.
And you trust media? I'm not translating the whole trial. It is a lost cause to stop american pitchforks. Racists as usual.
What? You went from a complex sentence to a complete trail log and went to "Media cannot be trusted".
BTW: You can also paste Italian stuff. Automated translators exist. They are not perfect but good enough.
I thought one think. Why argue with americans that are scandalized about an involontary grouping when is normal in us school to have mass shooting? Maybe he had to shoot the student, less problems.
This conversation is getting funnier by the moment. You still on "involuntary groping" without even acknowledging what I put up against this before.
And now you add the completely unrelated whataboutism regarding shootings in the US to this?
For how much you seem to hate on the Americans, you would make a great candidate for the republican party over there. Reactionary babbeling of bullshit and ignorance of every argument brought up against you works pretty well there.
I think the sentence they are referring to is the sentencing in the trial, not a sentence as in a string of words.
Might be. Would make sense
Yes, the verdict
So you're, like, omitting the important part?
(I'm not even disagreeing, but you're doing exactly what you're accusing "the other" of.)