485
submitted 3 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] GaMEChld@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

No that's ridiculous. Not seeing something is in No Way actively doing anything. It is by definition passive.

[-] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 4 points 3 months ago

The colour blindness of children is what you're thinking of. They're the only ones untainted by the racism they will inevitably be exposed to later in life.

You'd have to be incredibly innocent, ignorant, or obtuse, if you got to adulthood without being aware that a person's visible race will affect how others (like racists) will treat them.

[-] GaMEChld@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

It's easy to be aware of a fact in a moment and lose sight of it in practice it a complex scenario. As I said, I'm neuro divergent, and my closest friends who know me well would liken the naive or innocent way I view things to be similar to childlike naivete. Maybe their not the only ones as untainted as you think. I've grown up experiencing very little racism while being brown skinned, so I just don't think about it in my day to day view.

If there's two different forms of racial colorblindness, and it's ok for kids to be one and adults can't be the other one, I don't know it just sounds like dumb nonsense labels purposefully designed to start arguments. Almost sounds like troll language.

[-] joenforcer@midwest.social 4 points 3 months ago

No it's not, it's actively dismissing someone's race. The passive thing is to say nothing about it.

[-] GaMEChld@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

So I'm neuro divergent and I don't see people in terms of race. I guess I'm racist now. Who knew. You freaking people are why the right thinks we're insane. Blind people are racist too?

Here is me actively dismissing. I see your skin color and I make a conscious decision to omit that fact.

You are saying if someone doesn't actually notice the color of people when we see them we are racist. That's exactly like saying people who are deaf are rude for ignoring you when you speak. Ridiculous.

[-] joenforcer@midwest.social 3 points 3 months ago

We're not expecting you to see people in terms of race. That would be profiling. You're being far too literal and not making a point in good faith by trying to equate visual impairment in this context.

Please look up the difference between equality and equity, and why equality isn't sufficient and can in fact still be exclusionary in today's reality. That's the point we're trying to make here.

[-] GaMEChld@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Forgive me for thinking words mean what they say. This is part of the problem the left has in general. You guys are too lazy to have long discussions so you keep making up labels and words that no one knows what they mean then you go around calling people who aren't even fighting you racist. The entire tone of this thread has been beyond stupid. Don't get me started on how many letters have been added to LGBTQBBQWTF when the Q was supposed to be the end of it as a catch-all. It's like you guys WANT to be misunderstood.

this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2024
485 points (100.0% liked)

News

23376 readers
2572 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS