753
submitted 2 years ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] rusticus@lemm.ee 205 points 2 years ago

From the v1 Project 2025 website:

  • End no fault divorce
  • Complete ban on abortions without exceptions
  • Ban contraceptives
  • Ban IVF
  • Additional tax breaks for corporations and the 1%
  • Higher taxes for the working class
  • Elimination of unions and worker protections
  • Raise the retirement age
  • Cut Social Security
  • Cut Medicare
  • End the Affordable Care Act
  • Raise prescription drug prices
  • Eliminate the Department of Education
  • Use public, taxpayer money for private religious schools
  • Teach Christian religious beliefs in public schools
  • End free and discounted school lunch programs
  • End civil rights & DEI protections in government
  • Ban African American and gender studies in all levels of education
  • Ban books and curriculum about slavery
  • End climate protections
  • Increase Arctic drilling
  • Deregulate big business and the oil industry
  • Promote and expedite capital punishment
  • End marriage equality
  • Condemn single mothers while promoting only “traditional families”
  • Defund the FBI and Homeland Security
  • Use the military to break up domestic protests
  • Mass deportation of immigrants and incarceration in “camps”
  • End birth right citizenship
  • Ban Muslims from entering the country
  • Eliminate federal agencies like the FDA, EPA, NOAA and more
  • Continue to pack the Supreme Court, and lower courts with right-wing judges
  • Denying most veterans VA coverage
  • Privatizing Tricare
  • Classifying transpeople as "pornographic"
  • Banning gender-affirming care
  • Ban all porn
[-] frunch@lemmy.world 70 points 2 years ago

You're telling me all that is unpopular??! The "Don't Tread on Me" folks are falling over themselves to have this?

Sounds really non-tready, lol

[-] grubbyweasel@sh.itjust.works 23 points 2 years ago

Classifying transpeople as "pornographic"

??

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 19 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

What's your question? Have you never seen conservatives scapegoat a minority group before?

[-] anytimesoon@feddit.uk 17 points 2 years ago

I found that confusing too, but I guess it pairs well with

  • Ban all porn
[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 7 points 2 years ago

Yep. They want to make it illegal for trans people to exist and don't seem to understand why that would be a problem.

[-] skyspydude1@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I think it's mostly the association/"logic" being literally incomprehensible to someone with even the slightest capacity for reason. Classifying an entire group of people as "pornographic" is just so insanely nonsensical, it's difficult to look at and think of it as anything other than some insane word salad.

[-] grubbyweasel@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 years ago

What does being classified as a pornographic person entail

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

It means they will be persecuted in various creative ways. More than they are already, I mean. Could be anything from forbidding them from certain places and occupations to rounding them up and putting them in death camps. They're intentionally vague about how far they plan to go.

[-] Mirshe@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

The second. DeSantis already is playtesting this in FL by classifying, basically, being LGBT+ in public as "sexual" and making a law where sex offenders against children have the death penalty on the table. Since you're in public, there's a good chance CHILDREN could see you, so...well, you can fill in the rest.

[-] snow_bunny@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

Doesn't have to make sense. Just has to fit a narrative.

[-] kn0wmad1c@programming.dev 13 points 2 years ago

I always laugh when they say "ban contraceptives" because I guarantee that the men in congress voting for it have vasectomies. Are they going to reverse them?

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 13 points 2 years ago

No, those with the means will still continue to get them, whether that's knowing a doctor who will perform it illegally, or by traveling somewhere it's legal. Same as abortion.

[-] yamanii@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

As most have noted, the right has no objective, they are just against whatever the left is for.

[-] OlinOfTheHillPeople@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago

They're pretty consistent about cutting taxes for billionaires.

[-] rusticus@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago
[-] aquinteros@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

ban IVF? why would they ban a safe and correct use of technology to help couples conceive what the actual fuck, I don't think there is a single nation on earth that does this, can you get IVF in the middle east? this is just mind-blowingly neardenthal

[-] skvlp@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago

Do the GOP leadership think this is improvement? Do they push this precisely because it’s terrible - for some reason. I don’t understand the madness.

[-] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 years ago

You have the Christofacist nutjobs who want this, the power hungry fucks who want to control others, and the cowards lacking any ethics that don't want to offend the Christofacist nutjobs.

[-] skvlp@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

The christofacists wants to punish people who are not like them? That’s not in accordance with the teachings of Jesus, is it? I find mild amusement in the fact that according to the beliefs of these people, they themselves are probably going to hell…

[-] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago

That's true of every fascist regime using religion as an excuse. The Taliban isn't following the teachings of Islam either, just the parts that give them control.

[-] Revan343@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago

Do you know much about the bible? The Republicans are basically the Pharisees from Jesus' time.

Revelation also predicted that there'd be evil shitheads who claim to be Christian but actually follow the Anti-Christ, but that was an easy prediction, there's always evil shitheads who claim to be good, in any time and religion

[-] tburkhol@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

The one time Jesus went HAM, chasing religious leaders around their temple with a whip, and whose temple was it? Zeus? Bacchus? Any of those graven-image, many-gods cults? No - he went after his own Father's priests for being money-grubbing hypocrites.

I'm guessing that story doesn't come up often at CPAC or prayer breakfasts.

[-] skvlp@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

Not familiar enough to know details like that. Is “Pharisees as obsessed with man-made rules (especially concerning purity) whereas Jesus is more concerned with God's love; the Pharisees scorn sinners whereas Jesus seeks them out” an ok eli5 and tl;dr summary?

Yeah, I guess man kind is good at evil and shithead, unfortunately.

[-] Revan343@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago

A key thing with the Pharisees was that they were obsessed with the appearance of being pious, rather than actually being so. Much like many modern Christians who are obsessed with appearing faithful and just, but aren't so concerned with actually following Jesus' teachings

[-] diskmaster23@lemmy.one 5 points 2 years ago

It's about maximum profit and control.

[-] LouNeko@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

As an outsider I'm fine with all of this for the US, as long as the US is completely demilitarized and gets rid of every last one if their nukes. Can't have hyper-religious christian Nazis start nuclear crusades in the name of the only God that matters to them - The Dollar.

[-] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

It's fun to disassociate and dream up fantasy scenarios.

[-] LouNeko@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

I know, it's as likely as me shiting myself a pair of angel wings.

this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2024
753 points (100.0% liked)

News

36043 readers
2534 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS