123
submitted 2 months ago by Blaze@sopuli.xyz to c/interestingasfuck@lemm.ee
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] incompetentboob@lemmy.world 28 points 2 months ago

Wow that’s impressive.

Is it because the first two were prototypes so they bolted on whatever they needed without care for it looking nice or did they just refine it so much that they were able to simplify the design significantly?

[-] BastingChemina@slrpnk.net 15 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

The first two prototypes looked like what traditional rocket engine looks like.

For example:

The RS-25 engine that equipped the space shuttle and now the SLS launcher

https://www.spaceupclose.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/0050_2_SLS_KenKremer.jpg

The Vulcain 2.1 that is on the Ariane 6

https://www.esa.int/var/esa/storage/images/esa_multimedia/images/2017/10/vulcain_2.1/17217857-1-eng-GB/Vulcain_2.1_pillars.jpg

SpaceX put a lot of work on refining the engine, they also already produced more than 600 engines ! It's a crazy amount !

[-] atocci@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago

It's more of a refinement thing, where anything not absolutely necessary is removed, or 3D printed straight into the structure of the thing instead of added to the side.

[-] MyTurtleSwimsUpsideDown@fedia.io 10 points 2 months ago

I’m sure there is also a lot of diagnostic equipment that became superfluous or redundant once they figured out how the engine ran.

[-] BastingChemina@slrpnk.net 6 points 2 months ago

I think this happened mostly between Raptor 1 and 2

this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2024
123 points (100.0% liked)

interestingasfuck

1282 readers
1 users here now

Please go to !interestingshare@lemmy.zip

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS