845
submitted 3 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] TheFonz@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Here's the thing: If I don't include that I'm a leftie I spend the whole time defending why i'm not a conservative and never actually discussing the topic.

If I mention that I'm a leftie that disagrees with the main take: I spend the whole time defending why im not a conservative and never discussing the topic.

NO ONE ENGAGES WITH THE SUBSTANCE OF THE DISCUSSION

It's damned if I do damned if don't. This is cult behavior. If you disagree with my position, refute my position or provide an argument. There is no grace or charitability offered. Like, why?

So many people on this platform spend all their energy in labeling but never discussing the actual points.

[-] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 20 points 3 months ago

If I don't include that I'm a leftie I spend the whole time defending why i'm not a conservative and never actually discussing the topic.

Huh, so if you don't explicitly inform people that you identify as a leftist, everyone assumes that you aren't because of all of your right-wing positions? That sounds like a you problem...

I hate to break it to you, but if you're frequently encountering situations where you're the only person in the room who thinks you're a leftist, you're not a leftist. You can self-identify all you want, we don't have to believe you. And if other leftists think you aren't an ally, you absolutely don't get to correct the record on that by supporting Kyle Rittenhouse.

If I mention that I'm a leftie that disagrees with the main take: I spend the whole time defending why im not a conservative and never discussing the topic.

Dude's so mad he paraphrased the first sentence in his second sentence.

NO ONE ENGAGES WITH THE SUBSTANCE OF THE DISCUSSION

You're a self-proclaimed leftist who supports a fascist who murdered other leftists at a BLM protest. Everyone is engaging with the substance of your argument quite directly.

It's damned if I do damned if don't. This is cult behavior. If you disagree with my position, refute my position or provide an argument. There is no grace or charitability offered. Like, why?

Being a debatelord isn't helping with the right-wing accusations here, bud. The Kyle Rittenhouse case is old news. You know the Left's position on him. If being identified as a leftist is so important to you, you're going to have to accept that endorsing the murder of leftists while they protest isn't a narrative that is going to earn you anything ever.

So many people on this platform spend all their energy in labeling but never discussing the actual points.

You didn't defend your point at all in this post and are more concerned with people accepting you as a "leftie", so don't get mad that we're only responding to what you're giving us. At this point you're more interested in convincing us that you're a leftist than explaining in real terms why you like Kyle Rittenhouse and support killing BLM protesters in the street.

If you want to focus on the conversation, stop pearl-clutching every time someone tells you that you're wrong. If you want a discussion, stop getting hung up on being disagreed with and state your point like an adult.

[-] TheFonz@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

FOR THE RECORD: I DON'T SUPPORT KILE RITTENHOUSE; I THINK HE'S A POS

The fact that you automatically assumed that from the get-go is ALL I NEED TO KNOW about how much you care about reality or facts.

The ONLY thing you talked about is if is this guy really left or not?

[-] YeetPics@mander.xyz 8 points 3 months ago

spend the whole time defending

You're defending your braindead ideas, not 'which social group you're in'; it's irrelevant.

this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2024
845 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19089 readers
4538 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS