2063

uBlock Origin developer recommends switching to Firefox as Chrome flags the extension (github.com)

submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by TheImpressiveX@lemmy.ml to c/technology@lemmy.world

218 comments fedilink hide all child comments

~~https://www.neowin.net/news/ublock-origin-developer-recommends-switching-to-ublock-lite-as-chrome-flags-the-extension/~~

EDIT: Apologies. Updated with a link to what gorhill REALLY said:

Manifest v2 uBO will not be automatically replaced by Manifest v3 uBOL[ight]. uBOL is too different from uBO for it to silently replace uBO -- you will have to explicitly make a choice as to which extension should replace uBO according to your own prerogatives.

Ultimately whether uBOL is an acceptable alternative to uBO is up to you, it's not a choice that will be made for you.

Will development of uBO continue? Yes, there are other browsers which are not deprecating Manifest v2, e.g. Firefox.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] ekZepp@lemmy.world 66 points 4 months ago

[-] Muffi@programming.dev 4 points 4 months ago

What are the main differences, for someone considering going from Firefox to Librewolf?

[-] itslilith 3 points 4 months ago

Librewolf is to Firefox what Chromium is to Chrome, essentially. Removed many bloated Mozilla anti-features, has sensible (but not paranoid) privacy and security defaults and ships with uBlock origin pre-installed. You can archive all of that with Firefox, but Librewolf makes things easy for you.

[-] JaddedFauceet@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

the first comparison is not technically correct, in the sense:

Chrome is built on top of Chromium
LibreWolf is built on top of Firefox

LibreWolf implements additional privacy features and settings on top of Firefox. Chromium is the base browser that everyone else built on top of. It does not implement additional privacy features.

perhaps a better comparison would be: LibreWolf is to Firefox what Ungoogled Chromium is to Chromium

[-] owiseedoubleyou@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Librewolf is hardened out of the box whereas with Firefox, you have to harden it yourslf

[-] br3ad@infosec.pub 1 points 4 months ago

You should also consider arkenfox user.js

[-] Zink@programming.dev 1 points 4 months ago

I’ve been eyeing up librewolf, having made the switch to Firefox on all machines a while back.

If I’m using DDG for search, uBlock Origin, bitwarden, strict tracking protection, disabled data collection and ad measurements, and then have https-only in all windows and max protection dns over https, will I see any practical difference?

In this case I do prefer functionality over 100% perfect privacy and anti-advertising. I’m fortunate to be able to run Linux on my work machine (I use mint, btw) and so I use the browser versions of M365 including Teams video conferencing.

this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2024

2063 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

60059 readers

2598 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS