[-] thenexusofprivacy 3 points 6 months ago

Thanks very much, fixed now!

[-] thenexusofprivacy 3 points 6 months ago

You're not the only one who thinks that way -- opinions differ!

[-] thenexusofprivacy 3 points 6 months ago

Correct. Dorsey's early involvement is certainly grounds for concern -- the way I think of it, he's gone now but his stench lingers on -- but he's not influential there going forward.

[-] thenexusofprivacy 4 points 7 months ago

The Bridgy Fed dev didn't get browbeaten into anything, he thinks the opt-in approach is better (and I agree). And he's also said the backlash was probably deserved.

[-] thenexusofprivacy 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

There's a bit more on Mastodon then Lemmy - https://docs.joinmastodon.org/user/moving/#migration has the details. But not being able to move posts is a big limitation. And even the functionality that's implemented has some unpleasant surprises -- see https://erinkissane.com/notes-from-a-mastodon-migration

[-] thenexusofprivacy 4 points 8 months ago

Yeah. It's endemic in society, so there's no reason that specific social networks are magically exempt from it.

[-] thenexusofprivacy 4 points 9 months ago

Sure! There were actually several good examples in the thread you were in. But, it'll be interesting to see what else people point to.

[-] thenexusofprivacy 3 points 9 months ago

Thanks much for the detailed response! And thanks @TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org for the detailed response as well.

[-] thenexusofprivacy 4 points 9 months ago

The community is called "Fediverse", and this is about the fediverse, so yes it is the correct audience.

And there's plenty of anti-Blackness on Lemmy. In fact there's even a bunch of anti-Blackness in this thread -- as somebody on another instance said, it's illustrates why other instances have defederated lemmy.world! So, if you're looking for examples, have a look at this thread.

[-] thenexusofprivacy 4 points 9 months ago

Thanks, agreed that section heading needs work!

[-] thenexusofprivacy 3 points 1 year ago

There have been other waves, it's just that once they get shut down everybody loses interest and moves on. The PR for the one of the changes Mastodon just made was implemented in May 2023 after the Doge spam wave. And here's a June 2019 post talking about exactly the same kind of attack: "The problem we are experiencing is the spammer signing up on random open instances and sending spam remotely."

20

They've unveiled a new version, with some improvements. Fight for the Future's statement (not quoted in the Washington Post, of course, which is a mouthpiece for tech) says "we are glad to see the attorney general enforcement narrowed" but also notes that "As we have said for months, the fundamental problem with KOSA is that its duty of care covers content specific aspects of content recommendation systems, and the new changes fail to address that." So it's still a bad bill.

But just because they're claiming they have the votes in the Senate, it's not a done deal yet -- and it still has to go through the House. So, if you're in the US, call your legislators! https://www.stopkosa.com/

19
submitted 1 year ago by thenexusofprivacy to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

This is the just-released unclassified version of the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board's December 2020 classified report on the National Security Agency’s (NSA’s) use of XKEYSCORE, an intelligence analysis tool.

13

If you're in the US, https://stopkosa.com and EFF's page make it easy to contact your Senators and ask them to oppose #KOSA.

8
submitted 1 year ago by thenexusofprivacy to c/thenexusofprivacy

If you're in the US, https://stopkosa.com and EFF's page make it easy to contact your Senators and ask them to oppose #KOSA.

39
submitted 1 year ago by thenexusofprivacy to c/fediverse@lemmy.world

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/7992691

There are some straightforward opportunities for short-term safety improvements, but this is only the start of what's needed to change the dynamic more completely.

This is a draft, so feedback welcome!

2
submitted 1 year ago by thenexusofprivacy to c/thenexusofprivacy

There are some straightforward opportunities for short-term safety improvements, but this is only the start of what's needed to change the dynamic more completely.

This is a draft, so feedback welcome!

58
submitted 1 year ago by thenexusofprivacy to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

A deep dive into the Data Protection Review Court by Alfred Ng and John Sakellariadis, including some great perspectives from Max Schrems of noyb.eu

[-] thenexusofprivacy 3 points 1 year ago

They don't, at least not from your instance.

131
submitted 1 year ago by thenexusofprivacy to c/fediverse@lemmy.world

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/7477620

Transitive defederation -- defederating from instances that federate with Threads as well as defederating from Threads -- isn't likely to be an all-or-nothing thing in the free fediverses. Tradeoffs are different for different people and instances. This is one of the strengths of the fediverse, so however much transitive defederation there winds up being, I see it as overall as a positive thing -- although also messy and complicated.

The recommendation here is for instances to consider #TransitiveDefederation: discuss, and decide what to do. I've also got some thoughts on how to have the discussion -- and the strategic aspects.

(Part 7 of Strategies for the free fediverses )

8
submitted 1 year ago by thenexusofprivacy to c/thenexusofprivacy

Transitive defederation -- defederating from instances that federate with Threads as well as defederating from Threads -- isn't likely to be an all-or-nothing thing in the free fediverses. Tradeoffs are different for different people and instances. This is one of the strengths of the fediverse, so however much transitive defederation there winds up being, I see it as overall as a positive thing -- although also messy and complicated.

The recommendation here is for instances to consider #TransitiveDefederation: discuss, and decide what to do. I've also got some thoughts on how to have the discussion -- and the strategic aspects.

(Part 7 of Strategies for the free fediverses )

87
submitted 1 year ago by thenexusofprivacy to c/fediverse@lemmy.world

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/7371919

There's likely to be a lot of moving between instances as people and instances sort themselves out into the free fediverses and Meta's fediverses -- and today, moving accounts on the fediverse today. There are lots of straightforward ways to improve it, many of which don't even require improvements to the software. And there are also opportunities to make creating, customizing, and connecting instances easier.

(Part 5 of Strategies for the Free Fediverses )

4
submitted 1 year ago by thenexusofprivacy to c/thenexusofprivacy

Many of the Meta advocates I've talked to share the free fediverses' long-term goal of building a sustainable alternative to surveillance capitalism -- and the same is true for people on Bluesky. So there are likely to be situations where some of the people and instances in Meta's fediverses and Bluesky wind up as situational allies to the free fediverses.

A few areas where collaboration could be very useful:

  • A key principle of organizing is meeting people where they are.

  • Moderation on decentralized networks is a shared challenge.

  • Bringing concepts similar to Bluesky's custom feeds to the fediverses, and more generally focusing on human-focused and liberatory (as opposed to oppressive) uses of algorithms in decentralized social networks designed from the margins.

  • Meta's fediverses, Bluesky, and the free fediverses are all vulnerable to disinformation.

(Part 6 of Strategies for the free fediverses )

10
submitted 1 year ago by thenexusofprivacy to c/thenexusofprivacy

There's likely to be a lot of moving between instances as people and instances sort themselves out into the free fediverses and Meta's fediverses -- and today, moving accounts on the fediverse today. There are lots of straightforward ways to improve it, many of which don't even require improvements to the software. And there are also opportunities to make creating, customizing, and connecting instances easier.

(Part 5 of Strategies for the Free Fediverses )

view more: ‹ prev next ›

thenexusofprivacy

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF