That would be true if people posting here were representative. They're not. Most people dont follow the news, and gerrymandered districts mean it'll take a lot to change things.
Problem is that we are also seeing big declines in places without pesticides
you're welcome
You're welcome
Its not just about suicide. People kill family members, have a kid who becomes depressed, etc. Its not just the gun owner who is at increased risk. You're much more likely to do something dumb like shoot an "intruder" who is actually your spouse getting a midnight snack than somebody who is out to get you.
There is something to be said for communal mutual defense, but its simply not worthwhile for most people to keep a gun and ammo at home for self defense on pure safety grounds.
The problem with this approach is that for most people, most of the time, having a gun raises the risk for yourself and your household by more than it lowers it.
Its a very detailed plan for the Trump administration to follow to implement their vision of fascism. And yes, it is public
When I was canvassing during the election, people would tell me that Project 2025 didn't matter because Trump disavowed it. This is for people like you to show people who believed that.
The problem is that the Sacramento area is subect to very infrequent but really intense flooding, with the last episode being December 1860-January 1861. So recent memory and trends are a terrible predictor of what will happen.
The 25th amendment might help if half the cabinet wasn't on drugs