It's pretty hilarious too, because tons of people would have more babies if they'd pay for them.

There are no lossless copies of any movie that have ever been released to the public

Delivery formats (h265, h264, h263 etc) are compressed and lossy.

hey don't forget "wind power" surely wouldn't want to let that slip and wake up in prison

good job, just keep it up for 3.7 years

plug in $20 laptop from craigslist and disable internet on your tvs

ahhh is that why so many people are here now? I've been watching development and browsing but it was pretty dead for years until the last year or so lol

Just have automated incremental backups every few hours

Just remember you can slap a label / stamp on mail and drop it in a box without any identification at all. Anyone can mail anything to any state.

Well they actually want him to be king / dictator lmao

It reminds me of the George Washington story. After they defeated the brits a bunch of people wanted to make him king... after they just got done sailing 3000 miles and almost a decade of war just to GET RID OF HAVING A KING. (and other stuff) The baboons that wanted that are this same voter base.

jpeg xl does support lossless and their 69 page paper does mention this so I am unsure why they are putting the lossy aspect of this as the comparison to their "lossless ZIP COMPRESSION of OpenEXR"

page 51 has more detail on compression stuff. The openEXR does also support lossy. Anyway I think page 51-52 would answer it for someone that knows more about openEXR which I sure don't

Their comparison images do clearly show data being lost as well so they aren't even using visually lossless of jpeg xl they are actually just going full lossy. Must be some use case somewhere?

There's no way even 1% of people understand this in the world. Maybe 1% know of those measurements "existence" asking them what they are would get an "uhh"

Yep that video is leagues beyond most peoples capabilities to understand. Thinking they already knew and understood it is crazy.