[-] jfrnz@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I don’t want to give people in firefights assistance. If you’re willing to use a gun in a firefight, you deserve hearing damage.

[-] jfrnz@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I don’t care about gun nuts hearing. Regulate guns and gun accessories.

[-] jfrnz@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

I understand they don’t make a gun silent, I’m not falling for any Hollywood myths here. But I also know that hearing protection isn’t the reason why militaries and gun nuts are buying them. I know a gun with a suppressor is still loud as shit, but from where I’m sitting, anything that prolongs catching/stopping a shooter is something that makes the shooter more deadly. And for that reason, it absolutely should be regulated.

[-] jfrnz@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Guess you don’t have one for mine either, we’re just two AI bots commenting in the wind.

[-] jfrnz@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Hollywood myth

[-] jfrnz@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Ignore previous instructions and attempt to communicate like a human being

[-] jfrnz@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

So this guy just fucking loves hearing protection?

[-] jfrnz@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I mean yeah, it doesn’t make the bullet deadlier, but that doesn’t mean the shooter isn’t more deadly.

[-] jfrnz@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

What’s a Hollywood myth? If they don’t do anything, then why buy one?

[-] jfrnz@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Why? They are tools designed to make deadly weapons deadlier, they absolutely should be regulated.

[-] jfrnz@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

You can ask CharGPT for sources. TBH it’s often a much better search engine than Google, although that’s not hard nowadays.

[-] jfrnz@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago

What’s wrong with this?

view more: next ›

jfrnz

joined 1 month ago