[-] henchmannumber3@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago

Same people who made Obama phone jokes are eager to sign up to be ripped off by Trump mobile.

[-] henchmannumber3@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Somebody doth protest too much.

[-] henchmannumber3@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Do you find this weak troll act fulfilling and useful? Good use of your time? Healthy outlet for your emotional issues?

[-] henchmannumber3@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

So you are just actively advocating for a worse-than-useless solution that only helps ensure the least favorable party gets more votes while arrogantly pretending you know better than the people who have to live with the results. Got it.

[-] henchmannumber3@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

That's not a denial...

[-] henchmannumber3@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

The obvious answer, voting 3rd party doesn't register with you people.

So you admit you don't understand first past the post voting systems.

[-] henchmannumber3@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Yes, that's a subjective perspective on the matter. And...?

I also keep seeing this:

"The progressive congresswoman deserves the heat she's getting for her vote against a bill that would've held back aid to Jerusalem"

People keep calling the amendment a bill, which it is not. Even the PhD author of that article is misconstruing the vote in question despite correctly identifying it as an amendment elsewhere.

AOC voted against the bill that funded Israel. Full stop. Saying otherwise is counterfactual, i.e a lie. Full stop.

You can quibble over the repercussions of the amendment vote. I wouldn't have voted for or against it personally. But saying she voted for funding Israel is not correct. Saying she funds genocide is not only incorrect but would be defamation if she weren't a public figure.

But I will ask again, what is the value of attacking AOC on this point? Will it drive voters further to the left? Will it win primaries for progressive candidates? Will it in any way affect the funding of genocide in Gaza? What is the value of this fight? If it's just feeling self-righteous but doesn't have any useful results, why pursue it so fiercely? The only people this fight benefits are those who want someone farther right than AOC in office.

[-] henchmannumber3@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

That's what ranked choice voting can get you.

[-] henchmannumber3@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago

The headline is misleading. She voted against the bill.

[-] henchmannumber3@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

The idea of knowing what you want to do with your life is overrated. A lot of people do a lot of different things and often don't know what they're going to do until the inspiration hits them. In the meantime, do things you like. Don't make any big decisions without thinking about the implications. Try out new hobbies and activities and see if any of them feel like something you want to do more. Oftentimes one interest will drive you to a similar one.

Get a job if you need the basic stuff people need to survive. Preferably not a job that demands too much social masking if that sort of thing causes you anxiety. That may be hard to come by depending on your skill set though. You can look at people whose jobs you find interesting and ask them what they did to get there. But it may also just be a matter of finding a job you can tolerate so you're able to do the things you enjoy when you're not working.

[-] henchmannumber3@lemmy.world 51 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

You tout science, but you've cited an NPR interview where the conclusion you call "most likely" is described by issuing agencies as "low confidence." That doesn't make it seem "most likely" at all. What is most likely is that we don't have enough information to draw a definitive conclusion, so being judgemental about it might be hasty and hypocritical. The NPR interview also states that we don't know where the intelligence is coming from, so criticizing China for not being transparent but ignoring the secrecy of the intelligence agencies is a double standard.

The other source is a video from Ken LaCorte, who is a former Fox News executive who killed a legitimate Trump and Stormy Daniels story that turned out to be true, so his credibility is questionable on top of the fact he ran competing US political partisan websites and hired Macedonian teenagers to write the content to stir up contention.

You claim to never trust the media, but you're trusting a known manipulative media executive.

A better question is why the origin story matters so much to you. Does it change the need for masking or quarantines or vaccines in your opinion? If China came out and said it was a lab leak, how would it affect your life in a fundamental way?

People get banned on social media for legitimate and illegitimate reasons every day. This is a weird hill to die on.

view more: next ›

henchmannumber3

joined 1 month ago