If copyright on a work expired immediately after death, would be that a bad or good idea? by graphene in c/nostupidquestions@lemmy.world
[-] graphene@sopuli.xyz 3 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

I would shorten the initial term to 15 years instead but keep everything else the same, if the author can't be bothered to even file for an extension then they probably aren't earning money from the thing anyway. See below for why 15.

Do you guys just have flawless experiences or what? by graphene in c/linux@lemmy.ml
Jimmy Wales Says Wikipedia Could Use AI. Editors Call It the 'Antithesis of Wikipedia' by graphene in c/technology@lemmy.world
[-] graphene@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 day ago

Wikipedia's translation tool for porting articles between languages currently uses google translate so I could see an LLM being an improvement but LLMs are also way way costlier than normal translation models like google translate. Would it be worth it? And also would the better LLM translations make editors less likely to reword the translation to make it's tone better?

Do you feel sad for people born today? by graphene in c/asklemmy@lemmy.world
[-] graphene@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 day ago

Maybe not societal collapses but costly upheavals certainly.

Upvote if you think sparkling water is good :) by graphene in c/sparkling_water@lemm.ee
[-] graphene@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 month ago

Hey have you thought about making a community on another instance now that lemm.ee is going away?

graphene

joined 1 month ago