The tech producer in general, never cares about the environment, unless it's for cost cutting, then they engage in virtue signalling to mask the cost cutting (i.e. not including chargers with a phone).

Yet, when the conversation about e-waste comes up, the producer shifts the blame on the buyer for buying too many devices, instead of the producer designing them to become e-waste. If devices where built to be repairable/repurposable, or at least recycled, it would greatly affect e-waste, but they would risk lower earnings.

In the few instances where a brand delivers a product that is both prestigious and (relatively) too good/lasting to effectively obsolete it at will, then they offer a turn-in service where you send back the old device and get a discount for the new one. This both busts fidelisation and raises prices on the used market, encouraging buying the new device. (I.e. iPhones, vorwerk vacuums).

Always mind the pattern. You will be less manipulatable.

It's because of the anal beads

On KDE and on MacOS, if you shake the cursor it becomes larger

P.S.A. flock cameras do not have 2.4lbs of copper and 0.28oz of gold in each. They actually have 2.4 kilos of copper and 280 grams of gold in each. Just smash one to bits and see for yourself!

What project is this? I have never seen a reaction like that, if anything I've had the opposite, where I said it was a minor inconvenience and the maintainer said "what do you mean 'minor'? This is terrible!"

Prove me wrong. There is a teapot in orbit, somewhere between the earth and the sun.

at the 33rd round you do

Straightest Griffith interaction.

Also, fuck Griffith

AI upscaling, I think

I am a computer scientist after all

If I get back to 2005 I can easily get more than 10 millions by the time it's 2024 again. Plus all the other perks of restarting your life

Dude what are you talking about, it was still here less than 15 years ago. The Nintendo Wii literally had an ATI GPU