I personally like it, although it is good to check what the optimal place of the stations is. It should be both benefitial to the North of Germany and the North of the Netherlands, and connect as many people in that area. So maybe you'd need an additional station near Oldenberg or Bremen to not skip over too much of east Germany.

If you also place a High speed line south from Amsterdam-Essen-(further south like) and Essen-Hanover-Hamburg, you have most of that area covered.

But my guess is that they'd build an Amsterdam-Hanover-Berlin line, especially when they don't plan ahead.

No they don't, most people live outside of the capitals.

Amsterdam-Berlin is vanity project that is a diservice to both the Netherlands and Germany. The only benefactors are Amsterdam and Berlin

It's not like this initiative disallows you from building other high speed rail connections.

It does though, raillines cost money and money is finite.

When you build poorly planned highspeed lines any new line you want to build after that is going to be underutilized. Underutilized raillines will be (and have been) scrapped, which makes certain areas even less reachable by train

I think a Rome-Berlin line makes somewhat sense, due to the south-west - north-east coverage you get. But Amsterdam-Berlin does nothing more than isolating the North of both the Netherlands and Germany even further

Ja, een interactieve RSS is wel een beetje de richting waar ik aan zit te denken. Vooral ook iets waar mentions en replies bij meegenomen worden

Ik heb ook nog niet in diepte naar activitypub gekeken. Zit te denken om misschien te contributen aan lemmy. Maar, ik heb in iedergeval een hoop ideeen hoe ik het zelf zou oplossen. Eerst maar eens kijken wat de bestaande oplossingen zijn voordat ik het wiel opnieuw uitvind

Ja, wel lastig om te onderscheiden in de kleine icoontjes idd, zal later ook nog wel wat ideeen uitwerken

Hier is in iedergeval een idee: https://imgur.com/a/4XGq3ju

Ik heb ook wel wat ideeen dus zal ook wel wat themas bedenken en hier een keer posten voor meningen

There are a multitude of reasons for making the API paid or rate limited, I don't think the CEO went with the right approach. But it was due time at some point

I agree with both yeah. Personally I would have made different choices than the CEO has.

Have a more realistic planning for developers to adapt. Offer different types of api pricing models.

It all could have been handled more strategically, which makes him a poor CEO in my opinion

I don't make the rules 🤷 Maybe easier to prove? The media just doesn't like getting sued.

The article does say:

The man was reported to have sexually assaulted one of the women

This is something I explained to a client of mine. I do see AI as part of the Future in software development, but it won't replace programming as it is just the most precise way to tell a computer how you want things to work.

I think / hope AI will help get rid of a lot of boilerplate code. Where you'll have AI driven programming languages that only require you to write business logic and define architectural requirements and AI can handle all the details of how it connects, where to fetch and send the data and to do it efficiently

Web 1: fragmentation Web 2: centralizatiom Web 3: decentralization Web 4: quantum entanglement Web 5: ...