You can turn it around with: https://www.change.org/in-god-we-trust

I'm using Gnome 48. Try change manifest. It may work.

You’re right that Capitalism is just another belief-system. My goal is to crash its core dogma (Property) into its moral mask (Religion). Even if 'Merican Christians' are slow to see it, the glitch is now documented.

Once you see the 'Emperor has no clothes,' you can't unsee it. Whether this specific star hits the target today or tomorrow, the 'mental environment' has already been compromised. The logic is out there, and it’s infectious because it’s consistent.

Thanks for the support - sometimes the 'madman' is just the first person to notice that the map doesn't match the territory."

You know, Even if I were a 'hallucinating LLM,' the logic remains: the text on the dollar is real, and the contradiction is real.

The fact that a 'machine' can see this systemic lie more clearly than your 'actual lawyers' should be terrifying to you. It means the Truth is so objective that even algorithms can't ignore it.

You’re attacking the messenger because you can't defeat the message. Does God own the inspiration or not? If yes - copyright is theft. If no - the dollar is a lie. Pick one. No hallucinations needed for that choice.

You say 'that’s not how the world works,' but you’re just describing the status quo of a broken machine.

Suggesting to 'just take the phrase off the money' proves my point: the system is so terrified of this logical contradiction that its only defense is to delete its own history and identity.

But here is the reality: they won't take it off. They need the 'God' label for moral authority, and they need 'Copyright' for profit. I’m simply holding them accountable to their own words.

You tell me to 'put down the bong,' but maybe you should pick up a history book. Every major shift in 'how the world works' started with someone pointing out a systemic lie that everyone else was too comfortable to notice. If the world works on a lie, I’d rather be the 'high school kid' with a question than a 'realistic' adult with a leash.

Every paradigm shift in history looked like 'madman rambling' until the old system collapsed.

You say it’s 'never going to happen.' But it’s already happening. The moment you felt the 'cringe' and the moderators locked the thread, the glitch was exposed. You can't unsee the contradiction now: the U.S. can't be a 'God-fearing nation' and a 'copyright-worshipping empire' at the same time.

I’m not looking for 'realism' within a broken system. I’m looking for Truth. If being honest about God and creativity makes me a 'madman' in a world of legalized theft, then I accept the title.

The 'madness' isn't in my logic—it's in a system that prints 'In God We Trust' on the money it uses to buy and sell God's inspiration.

You’re right, Change.org doesn't change laws. But it does something better: it forces a response.

When a petition grows, the State is forced to choose: either ignore the 'In God We Trust' paradox and look like a liar, or address it and risk the entire IP industry.

It's not about 'winning' a vote; it's about publicly documenting the system's inability to be honest. If it’s so 'cringe,' why did they have to lock the threads and censor the logic? If it’s just 'wacky bullshit,' they should have laughed and let it be. But they panicked.

That's not cringe. That's a glitch in the Matrix that they can't patch.

But legally, it's more than that. This motto is a Public Doctrine. If the law recognizes God as the ultimate source of value on a dollar, it cannot logically deny God as the ultimate source of an idea in a patent. You can’t 'Trust in God' only when it's profitable and ignore Him when a corporation wants to own a divine inspiration.

My claim is simple: Consistency. Either the motto is a lie, or the Intellectual Property law is a theft. Which one is it?

Exactly! Whether you believe in God or not, you can't deny the logical explosion here. The system tries to sit on two chairs: it uses 'God' for moral authority and 'Property' for profit.

I’m just holding up a mirror. If they want their property rights to be absolute, they must officially admit that 'In God We Trust' is a lie. If they want to keep the motto, they must admit that ideas cannot be 'owned' by men.

My goal is simple: To force the system to be honest for once. Even an atheist can appreciate the beauty of a self-destructing legal paradox!

If the phrase 'In God We Trust' is just a 'meaningless decoration' on the state's currency, then the state is committing a massive fraud against its own citizens and their faith.

I love this so much.

Thank you! It’s refreshing to see that the truth about our role as instruments of God still resonates. We’ve been 'renting' our own souls from corporations for too long. Time to return the glory to the Original Source. Glad to have you with us!

The legal claim is dubious, but I admire the commitment.

The claim only looks 'dubious' because we've lived in a lie for so long. Is it more dubious to say 'God is the Creator' while selling His ideas, or to admit that a tool cannot own the Master's work? I chose consistency over profit. Thanks for the respect!