Hejsan, Jag håller med! :)

Don't really want to doxx myself, but in the Helsinki area

I completely agree, it was one in a million and I was extremely surprised when it happened.

I've never been on the receiving end of a "that happened" before. Not really sure what to do about it. But I get it.

Yes, it's a bigger store where the bottom floor is groceries and the top is more of a department store with a few shelves of computer and phone stuff, among other things.

"Fåntratt", litterally translated as "idiot funnel". Something you might call a silly person

Oh, why is that? I'm playing it on the steamdeck, so I'll check it out!

DOOM (1993): I like it. First time playing it, just finished "knee-deep in the dead" and started the next chapter!

Shadow of the tomb raider: gameplay is fun but the story isn't as fun as the previous games. Something just feels off to me.

I also just bought most of the resident evil games in the new humble bundle, have only played a little of 1 remaster, a year ago, and 5, about 10 years ago. I like weird scifi horror and this seems like just that, so hope I'll like it, when I finally get around to playing them!

Here's the video about it from their channel: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7KKCWGN2fBs

It uses addition to dial. just press button three 333 times and you'll be fine!

I might be a little late to this thread. I'm currently working on two robots, the first one is a hexapod that I'm rebuilding and reprogramming, using a teensy 4.0, while not technically an arduino it uses the arduino ide so I'll count it. The second one is a smaller autonomous rover with a lidar, it uses a raspberry pi 4b as the brains and has an arduino nano to move the motors and take movement commands. It runs on ros, and I can now click on a map in rviz to have it move there. Currently working on pathing. The plan is to move the lidar to the hexapod once I'm done with the rover and the hexapod.

The footnotes are pretty much their own story. The book is written like a textbook so it might be quite hard to read sometimes, and it is sometimes boring but still somehow interesting. I don't think there really is a correct way of reading it though, I mean, you could skip the footnotes but then you'd only kind of get 1/3 of the story. There are footnotes and then there are footnotes of the footnotes.

I've seen "should of" in a book before. I think it was house of leaves, that had a bunch of them in it but it was only from one characters perspective if I remember correctly, so it might have been a stylistic choice. Still recommend the book though.