[-] TimePencil@infosec.exchange 1 points 22 hours ago

@Hugin

Ah, cool. So, O2 replenishment is still required. Ta!

[-] TimePencil@infosec.exchange 3 points 1 day ago

@Tenderizer

America invade Australia?
I thought they'd already done that...
... to just about every country.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rr8ljRgcJNM

@Davriellelouna

[-] TimePencil@infosec.exchange 2 points 1 day ago

@Hugin

I'm probably wrong, but AFAIK subs (navy war vessels) don't actually need much "new" or "introduced" oxygen when submerged.

Us humans breathe out just as much oxygen as we breathe in - it's just that it's contaminated with carbon - CO2.

I don't think that nuclear powered subs "generate" or "create" much oxygen for the purposes of life support.

Instead, subs use CO2 "scrubbers" that are replaced at regular intervals. (See space flight, especially Apollo 13...)

As stated, "diesel electric" subs ALSO need to either surface or "snorkel" when running on diesel to recharge their batteries.

@maniacalmanicmania

[-] TimePencil@infosec.exchange 3 points 1 day ago

@No1

There IS a seal in that photo.

To see it, ya gotta put on some goggles and stick your head in the water.

@FireWire400

[-] TimePencil@infosec.exchange 3 points 1 day ago

@noorbeast

Port? Use of "port" to denote a bag, suitcase, or other "carry all"?

Only octogenarians use "port" in this manner...

@maniacalmanicmania

[-] TimePencil@infosec.exchange 10 points 1 week ago

@Zagorath

"Road usage" has been taxed through the fuel excise paid at the bowser. This method is far from perfect, but it does allow reasonably anonymous travel.

In the future, the gov't will have (at least) two ways of taxing the road usage of EVs.

One way will be fair, equitable, based on 'mileage', and anonymous.

The other way will permit the government to conduct 'real time' monitoring of every vehicle's speed and position.

Our gov't will choose this second option, and with bipartisan support.

@Davriellelouna

[-] TimePencil@infosec.exchange 11 points 1 week ago

@No1

The French wouldn't say that. They'd say whatever is French for "Sign here!"

We'd then pay them a few more BILLION dollars, and the French would wait a week or two for another policy reversal.

At the rate we're going, we'll end up buying our subs from China...

@Davriellelouna

[-] TimePencil@infosec.exchange 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

@Zagorath

Half a penny?
Where's the rest of it?

[-] TimePencil@infosec.exchange 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

@ada

Methinks Zag was suggesting (possibly) that 'age verification' should be a *device* and *operating system* (& platform) feature that would be *inactive* by default.

In other words, there should be nothing for an adult (without kids) to do in order for their devices to function as they do now.

A parent would be required to activate a 'child lock' feature on a device before handing it to their kids.

Unfortunately, all governments are too chicken-shit scared to compel parents to do this small thing.

Governments *prefer* the option of compelling ALL users to provide 'age verification' (possibly Gov't issued ID) to the relevant platforms.

For the 'Liberals' this would be a natural extension of their right wing fascism.

For the Labor party, it's merely a reflection of their general incompetence.

@Zagorath

#auspol

[-] TimePencil@infosec.exchange 13 points 1 month ago

@princessnorah

No, nothing wrong.

However, due to their shape, there is the delightful possibility of the misapplication of said vegetables as a particular variety of adult toy.

(Everyone's mind went there... didn't it? Didn't it?)

@DiaDeLosMuertos

[-] TimePencil@infosec.exchange 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

@princessnorah

China does make a LOT of really low quality goods. However...
... those goods are made to the quality specified by the importer / wholesaler / buyer...
... because 'cheap' goods are often preferred over 'more expensive but higher quality' goods...
... by the people who buy them.

Which is probably what happened in this case!

I *think* that most Ming dynasty vases are still 'under warranty'!

@DiaDeLosMuertos

[-] TimePencil@infosec.exchange 17 points 4 months ago

@quokka

Yeah.
It's a toss-up between NOT printing it out so as to not waste paper...
... or printing it out so one can wipe one's arse with it.

@MHLoppy

view more: next ›

TimePencil

joined 9 months ago