[-] Sandbar_Trekker@lemmy.today 2 points 6 days ago

Nice! The main character was fairly consistent across the scenes. Still some improvements to be made, but keep up the great work!

[-] Sandbar_Trekker@lemmy.today 2 points 6 days ago

I think you're in the wrong community...

[-] Sandbar_Trekker@lemmy.today 28 points 6 days ago

Its probably better this way.

Otherwise you end up with people accusing movies of using AI when they didn't.

And then there's the question of how you decide where to draw the line for what's considered AI as well as how much of it was used to help with the end result.

Did you use AI for storyboarding, but no diffusion tools were used in the end product?

Did one of the writers use ChatGPT for brainstorming some ideas but nothing was copy/pasted from directly?

Did they use a speech to text model to help create the subtitles in different languages, but then double checked all the work with translators?

Etc.

[-] Sandbar_Trekker@lemmy.today 3 points 1 week ago

Oh man, the times I could have used this. Thanks!

[-] Sandbar_Trekker@lemmy.today 2 points 1 week ago

This decision was made without the assistance of automation.

Suuuure. Exactly the kind of thing a crab would say!

[-] Sandbar_Trekker@lemmy.today 30 points 1 week ago

In the U.S. they may even offer things like State Park passes.

4

Video that goes over some of the issues today with AI generated content and some attempts to prove something that's real.

[-] Sandbar_Trekker@lemmy.today 51 points 1 week ago

Given the trend of recent posts in here. I'm going to guess that the word "toxic" triggered the automod.

Sandbar_Trekker

joined 5 months ago