[-] RecursiveParadox@piefed.social 2 points 21 hours ago

Friends in the know say it's all of the right.

[-] RecursiveParadox@piefed.social 5 points 21 hours ago

Just wait until Neuromancer drops. Have word it will be beyond dope.

Believe it or not, some of my clients have to deal with this very question.

There is no actual mechanism for kicking a member state out.

You can try to starve them out by not sending any financial support, which has worked a little (Poland), but clearly is not enough.

This is ...wishful thinking. As in I really wish it were true. And it is kinda, but you're talking about 0.0001% of the oceangoing fleet and nearly as little for wind farms doing this.

The infrastructure for this kind of fuel isn't there. In fact, there is an intense battle between ammonia, hydrogen, biofuels and LNG (thus far in the lead) for what will replace fuel oil/gas oil. Until the infrastructure is built of something very, very seriously constrains supply, we are stuck with carbon for at least 20-25 years no matter how hard we pivot tomorrow. Not saying we shouldn't pivot, but that's the commercial reality.

But at this point alternatives are few on the ground and consist mainly of small ferries with batteries or huge duel fuel (LNG) containerships, and there are less than a couple of dozen of these in the world now.

You'll have to be a bit more specific. Do you mean travel as in people going to other places? Sure just not in giant cruise ships.

If you mean transporting commodities and goods, you are shit out of luck until someone does a valence jump in battery energy density.

Yes very good indeed!

New episode tonight baby!

The "gunned" is a good rhetorical effect.

[-] RecursiveParadox@piefed.social 10 points 6 days ago

Prices for the kinds of fuel ocean going ships burn have increased 25%-35% depending on the port.

view more: next ›

RecursiveParadox

joined 5 months ago