Given how placid the average democratic is, I'm pretty confident they will be given the chance.

I think the bad taste in my mouth is the 300k copies they sold and the need to then do this? Stepping over pounds to save pennies etc.

I thought the article explained that pretty reasonably on a scale of probability and weight. The longer the text, the more reliable the scoring.

Sell access to Turnitin and the likes for a small fortune. They are all but required to pay whatever the price is.

The publisher sold keys to GreenManGaming (and probably other stores ) and then the developers unilaterally revoked all serials without first checking if they were legitimate?

Sounds like the developers are running their company out of a shed and are immature.

He 100% has no fucking clue what he is saying or doing from day to day and is being fed bullshit by people behind him. Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain bullshit.

My guess would be almost all routinely updated Filterlists will continue to block Facebook ads, and probably even more relentlessly now.

What the heck is your point exactly? We shouldn't have mass surveillance? But we already do... Have you seen how many cameras there are? Do you know DWP can access your internet history if they suspect benefit fraud? No warrant required.. And that's one of dozens of government departments that can just whip up your internet history..

This isn't some grand attempt at putting the final bit of the puzzle together.. there are legitimately multiple generations of children who can't read, accessing brain dead content that are turning into potatoes and becoming radicalised... Shall we just stop all attempts at preventing that because you're worried about your privacy?

Donald is a baby that shits and vomits all over your car. You can get a detailer to clean up the mess, but it will never be the same again, and always have that faint smell of crap.

Then what is the problem with the bill? Everyone is up in arms about censorship and monitoring their identity but that already happens. This bill just means it's harder for kids to access garbage sites? The capabilities to do all the things people think this bill will achieve already do exist in any case...

I was led to believe people on Lemmy are more technically minded. So can you explain to me how you don't think the government has the technical capabilities to already monitor internet usage of its citizens? The DWP can already access your internet history if they suspect benefit fraud already, for example...

Let me get this straight. You would vote for any other party, which equates to reform getting in and doing an unimaginable amount of damage to the country, because labour has banned YouTube, tiktok, Snapchat and Facebook for kids?