It's not the model, I think. I tried it on my comfyUI, chroma v48, it barely ever gives me extra limbs. It could be the resolution. The model was trained in 1024x1024 format, and the options offered on perchance don't match. But to compensate for that perchance offers great image quality, the workflow (or loras) or whatever sampler/scheduler combinations... I've tried it all with the latest chroma and couldn't replicate it. It's amazing here on perchance.
could you provide a link to your generator at least? for select elements id should always be different. if you want to use the same list twice you just change the id. but actually seeing what you are talking about would be a start.
<input type="text" id="shownHere">
<select id="userChoosesHere" onchange="document.getElementById('shownHere').value=this.value;">
Something like this?
That's what CEO's of major AI companies like OpenAI say on youtube and x. All but one of them are optimistic about continuous learning AI's by mid 26, and the other guy says "within 5 years".
The model is trained by the devs. Continuous learning from user experience is a thing of 2026 I think, maybe 2027.
You could try my generator: https://perchance.org/imageconstructor. Choose as many details for a character from the menus as you want, type extra details in the prompt if needed, then go to Tools -> Save. You can always return to that character, Actor -> Main character -> Saved. Then, you can use Pose menu to choose camera angles, pose and facial expressions for that character and scenes for place, light, weather and background/vibe. There's little consistency with the faces in the new AI model, but If you provide enough details and choose to generate many images at once (in the Style menu), then one of them look like the one you had in mind. You can also narrow the variety of faces and styles it generates by choosing a famous artist in the Styles menu and sampler in the Tools. Small disclaimer: we only recently got the new model, the generator is in the early beta, I'm open to any suggestions.
I don't have inside information on that, but I'll share my experience here. I think all of the authors are recognized, there's plenty of information on the web to find about them, but the new model lacks consistency (while it's training, or maybe it's the model's intrinsic feature of diversity?). If you ask flux to generate Eiichiro Oda, for example, and generate 3 images at once, one of them will remind Oda's style and the other two would be something you could see somewhere else.
I asked this question before, and got a response that we can't access iframe elements. My work around was to use "relative" and "absolute" styles to position buttons on top of the generated images.
try adding "unfocused eyes" to the negative prompt
Try "camera" or "the first person" or "the viewer", works for me. Also, check if you have contradicting prompts, like "looking to the side/away" and then next line it's "looking at the camera".
I'm pro new AI model because it generally tries to follow your description but I can agree that this insanity with lips contouring ruining it. I've tried negative and positive prompts with hundreds of "lip contouring", "lip surgery", "natural lips", "thin lips" etc, the same for brows. It's ugly in real life and it's ugly when AI tries to copy it, but unfortunately I couldn't get rid of it completely. The only hope is that it's still learning and we'll get the variety with time. And if someone found a solution, please make a post about it.
Most browsers have a grammar check option. You need to look into your browser settings and enable it.