[-] ExLisper@linux.community 37 points 2 years ago

simultaneously defending himself in both cases would put him in a no-win situation.

What is that even supposed to mean? He has to prove that his actions where justified. How is his a no-win situation? Is his plan to first argue that he's innocent because he wasn't trained correctly and acted out of fear and then claim in the second case that he actually received proper training?

[-] ExLisper@linux.community 37 points 2 years ago

WTF? Have you never met a kid in your life? Kids are stupid, their brains are still developing. You can't just reason with them, explain that the thing they want is stupid and that they should actually want something else. It gets worse with teenagers, they think they are actually smart and stop listening while thinking that every choice they make will have a huge impact on their entire life. Telling them to "suck it up and find some other friends" has to be the most pointless thing you can do.

Look, I hate kids, don't have any and never will but even I understand how fucked up it has to be for your kid to be excluded from activities because they don't have a phone or have the wrong one. Being a parent now has to really suck. All kids bond over things that are bad for them (social media) so you pretty much have to choose how do you prefer to hurt your kid: by giving them a phone or by making them an outcast.

[-] ExLisper@linux.community 37 points 2 years ago

For anyone interested what happened (according to some anonymous whistle-blower):

They had to remove the door plug to replace damaged pressure seal but didn't want to run QA on the plug after installing it back so they didn't mark it as 'removed' in the tracking system, they simply treated it as door that were "opened". Parts were missed when inserting the plug, QA didn't check because it wasn't in the system, plane was delivered to the client. The rest is history.

There' s a lot of backstory to it but that's the direct cause. Supposedly.

[-] ExLisper@linux.community 35 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

He's not a moron. He's a very rich psychopath.

[-] ExLisper@linux.community 37 points 2 years ago

I don't get it. The article says that hardware is 1974 was expensive but UNIX was cheap to develop. Linus developing Linux just confirms what they are saying. Is the joke that computers used to be expensive and now they are cheap?

[-] ExLisper@linux.community 35 points 2 years ago

It's not making Turing test obsolete. It was obvious from day 1 that Turing test is not an intelligence test. You could simply create a sufficiently big dictionary of "if human says X respond with Y" and it would fool any person that its talking with a human with 0 intelligence behind it. Turing test was always about checking how good a program is at chatting. If you want to test something else you have to come up with other test. If you want to test chat bots you will still use Turing test.

[-] ExLisper@linux.community 35 points 2 years ago

Nothing. 6.6.6 was already released.

[-] ExLisper@linux.community 35 points 2 years ago

I've been to US and it's really hard to use public transport in places without sidewalks... Seriously, I once parked on the other side of the road from a cinema and discovered there's no way to cross the road without driving. The way everything is car focused goes way beyond poor lines and timetable. You would have to not only completely rebuild lots of infrastructure but also change culture and habits of most people living there.

[-] ExLisper@linux.community 35 points 2 years ago

In Poland you just tell them there's no more vodka.

[-] ExLisper@linux.community 37 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Yey, news about Poland on lemmy!

Oh, right, I forgot it's still Poland...

[-] ExLisper@linux.community 36 points 2 years ago

Climate change 'looming'? Dude, it's already here.

[-] ExLisper@linux.community 36 points 2 years ago

No headphone jack? Not interested.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

ExLisper

joined 2 years ago