Thanks for the read.
Thank you for this.
For some reason, I thought Lemmy had more women specifically because of how Reddit treats women. 😅
Still, it's not like people are incapable of understanding others who are different from them. I'm hopeful the men here will listen to reason.
This.
I support AI, but I don't understand why AI bros are complicating things or making things all-or-nothing.
OpenAI had enough money to hire a hitman on one of their whistleblowers. They can afford to pay for content, lol.
Exactly, imagine if we threw away the entire peer review process and made it about, "Well I have a PhD! Checkmate."
We'd descend into a dark age for science.
Yeah, both sides are wrong here.
Dunning-Kruger is bad, but so is credentialism and appeal to authority.
Doing okay.
Just picked up my cat's ashes today, but also ate some pizza with my bf.
I did okay on my midterms. Got an 85%.
So this is the manual that the bad tech support lines use. 😭
I must be a reincarnation of this guy, cuz I'm literally working on a micro-book called, "Rationalized Malice: How Faulty Logic Justifies Harm."
The book won't be out for a while (I'm in uni and have some high-impact research projects coming up), but it'll be practical in that 80% of it will be what you can do, as an individual.
Thank you so much! I'll check them out and promote my community there. 😌
Oh my gosh, thank you so much!
I hope you join! The community is new, but I'm already working on stickied posts of resources. Expect another post in the community within 2 hours.
Since OP admitted this was "made-up clickbait and satire," I'll just comment for anyone stumbling upon this. You can: