48
submitted 1 year ago by mellowheat@suppo.fi to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
all 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 year ago
[-] BruceTwarzen@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

They just sped up the process

[-] gomp@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

For the non-US people: 21,000 acres are around 84km² (a bit more than a 9 by 9km square).

I have zero idea how big the reef was to begin with (and God must have forbidden journalists from publishing data that would allow readers to make sense of the numbers they put in the headlines), but still it seems like decent amount was destroyed.

[-] mellowheat@suppo.fi 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah, it's not a lot percentually: that coral reef is estimated to be roughly 4600 square kilometers (though I found another source saying it to be over 26000).

But then again, the Amazon Forest is 6,7 million square kilometers, so if you look at just the numbers, it doesn't seem like much if 10 000 square kilometers is lost every year.

[-] Grail@lemmy.soulism.net 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The most sensible unit of measurement is that it's 210 pooh bear forests, because that's the only way I know what an acre is

this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2024
48 points (100.0% liked)

World News

36879 readers
1002 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS