GOG.com tried to launch that 9 years ago (source). The problem is getting the rights to sell the films without DRM. No major production company would want an easily shared file so readily available...

It would cost millions to get the rights for a single film. And you're going to sell it DRM-free for $10? Good luck getting financial backing on that.

youre forgetting that in the real world if its not about making money, it wont happen. youre immersed in a society that doesnt even want to give life-saving medicine at-cost to those who need it, cuz profits.

theres this insane notion that if your business or portfolio isnt growing financially, your business is a failure. untenable is putting it nicely.

Film companies aren't generally in the business of selling the rights to their products. As you say, it's a cash cow they can keep milking for years. They can re-release the same film on new platforms and continually contract it out to different streaming platforms for years. Why would they sell you a distribution license in perpetuity for anything resembling an reasonable cost?

But as we all know the greedy capitalists can't keep milking the same old cashcows if the users have a permanent copy that they can potentially also distribute so that won't happen any time soon.

Might I introduce you to a greedy capitalist invention called reels, vinyl records, cassette tapes, 8track tapes, VHS, DVDs, Blu-ray, game cartridges, and game disks.

What you say won't happen any time soon was the way it has worked since the invention of cassettes until "we all" decided that netflix was better than blockbuster. This is the consequences of our own actions as consumers, relinquishing physical discs that can be burned in favor of digital only copies controlled by their companies, held on their servers. My DVD copy of Kung Pow! Enter the Fist can't just be taken off of my shelf like netflix can take it off their server, nor can they take the mp4 with commentary and extras stored on my external hdd ripped with handbrake to bypass the DRM attempt.

And frankly, I'd personally rather pay for a physical copy, but a "free" digital copy as you suggest I'd also settle for. I can resell the disc though, and I can do so after I rip its contents.

@basic_user Someone beat me to it. Rights holders would never allow their movies to be distributed without DRM of some kind.

like half the movies i want to watch are not available anywhere legally in my country, so the choice is piracy or not watching it

Your idea sounds a lot like how the libraries operate here in Toronto. They have lots of media available to borrow besides books: movies and tv shows on Blu-Ray, video games for various consoles, etc. I've seen folks come borrow armfuls of Blu-Rays, all free of charge. You also have access to various media via streaming/online as well, although I'm not sure how extensive the collection is.

It's not perfect though; there are limits on how many copies of a digital item can be checked out simultaneously. It's a rather artificial constraint.

I wonder...what it would take to get a license to start an institution like a library to allow for others to borrow media like this?