884
True (i.postimg.cc)
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] MsPenguinette 77 points 1 year ago

I’m very happy to see that the industry has moved away from the blockchain hype. AI/ML hype at least useful even if it is a buzzword for most places

[-] ritswd@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago

So true.

With LLMs, I can think of a few realistic and valuable applications even if they don’t successfully deliver on the hype and don’t actually shake the world upside down. With blockchain, I just could never see anything in it. Anyone trying to sell me on its promises would use the exact words people use to sell a scam.

[-] nothacking@discuss.tchncs.de 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Blockchain is a great solution to a almost nonexistent problem. If you need a small, public, slow, append only, hard to tamper with database, then it is perfect. 99.9% of the time you want a database that is read-write, fast and private.

[-] ritswd@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

My thoughts exactly.

I was told that except for flying scams under regulatory radars, the thing it’s great at is low-trust business transactions. But like, there are so many application-level ways to reasonably guarantee trust of any kind of transaction for all kinds of business needs, into a private database. I guess it would be an amazing solution if those other simpler ways didn’t exist!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] rikudou@lemmings.world 5 points 1 year ago

We're currently adding AI support to our platform for email marketing and it's crazy what can be done. Whole campaigns (including links to products or articles) made entirely by GPT-4 and Stable Diffusion. You just need to proofread it afterwards and it's done. Takes 15 minutes tops (including the proofreading).

[-] piecat@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

takes 15 minutes tops

Not including the hours dicking around with prompts.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] blue_zephyr@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

Only charlatans were recommending blockchain for everything. It was painfully obvious how inefficiently it solved a non-existent problem.

[-] Rufio@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You could always tell because no one could ever really explain it in simple terms what it does or why it was useful, other than trying to defend NFTs existing and enjoying the volatility of the crypto market (not currency).

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] where_am_i@sh.itjust.works 66 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The biggest problem is that even OP is unaware of what is really being skipped: math, stats, optimization & control. And like at a grad level.

But hey, import AI from HuggingFace, and let's go!

[-] Sylver@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago

Why walk when you can learn to run!?

[-] TeamDman@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago

The worst part of ML is Python package management

[-] Knusper@feddit.de 5 points 1 year ago

Yeah, I feel like Python is partly responsible for most of this meme. It's easy for very simple scripts and it has lots of ML libraries. But all the stuff in between is made more difficult by the whole ecosystem being focused on scripting...

[-] tool@r.rosettast0ned.com 4 points 1 year ago

The worst part of ML is Python package management

Do you have some time to talk about our Lord and Savior, venv?

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 27 points 1 year ago

Where's discrete mathematics?

[-] theGimpboy@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

Math? I write code, that's words bro. Why would I ever need math?

[-] src@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 year ago

This is sadly how a lot of Computer Science students think nowadays.

[-] Celivalg@iusearchlinux.fyi 6 points 1 year ago

I think the problem is that they are trying to teach math to generalists where in front of them are students formed to understand programmatical problems.

Where the problems be restructured to a programatical problem, then it would work far far better.

Mathematical exercises aim to solve 1 problem with 1 given set of parameters, programatical exercises aim to solve 1 problem with ANY given sets of parameters.

And that's what made me loose interest in math during my CS years.

[-] MBM@lemmings.world 4 points 1 year ago

Mathematical exercises aim to solve 1 problem with 1 given set of parameters

Maybe you just had some really bad teachers, but I couldn't disagree more. A big part of maths is proving statements that hold very generally (and maybe making it even more abstract, e.g. applying it to anything you can add and multiply instead of just real numbers). It kind of starts when your answers start being formulas instead of numbers but it goes much further

[-] Scrappy@feddit.nl 4 points 1 year ago

On the first floor

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] familyfriendly@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

I've been programming for like 5 years now and never even attempted anything AI/ML related

[-] k3yword@lemmy.fmhy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

Same. I know my limits lol

[-] blue_zephyr@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Unless you're dead set on doing everything yourself, it's pretty easy to get into.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] dRLY@lemmy.ml 23 points 1 year ago

This kind of vibe is becoming actually scary from a "no one knows how X actually works, but they are building things that might become problematic later" headspace. I am not saying that everyone needs to know everything. But one really really bad issue I see while fixing people's PCs is that a shocking amount of high school and college aged folks are really about media creation and/or in comp sci majors. However they come to me with issues that make me question how they are able to function in knowing so many things that all involve computers, but not the computers themselves.

These next paragraphs are mostly a rant about how the OSes are helping make the issue grow with all users and not just the above. Also more ranting about frustration and concern about no one caring about fundamentals of how the things they make their stuff on function. Feel free to skip and I am marking as a "spoiler" to make things slightly less "wall of text".

spoilerSome of it is the fault of the OSes all trying to act like smartphone OSes. Which do everything possible to remove the ability to really know where all your actual data is on the device. Just goes on there with a "trust me bro, I know where it is so you don't need to" vibe. I have unironically had someone really really need a couple of specific files. And their answer to me when I asked if they knew where they might be saved was "on the computer." Which was mildly funny to see them react when my face led to them saying "which I guess is beyond not helpful." I eventually convinced him to freaking try signing into OneDrive like I had told him to do while I checked his local drive files. Which turns out it was not on the PC but in fact OneDrive. That was a much more straight forward moment. Microsoft tricking people into creating Microsoft Accounts and further tricking them into letting OneDrive replace "Documents", "Desktop", and "Pictures" local folders at setup is a nightmare when trying to help older folks (though even younger folks don't even notice that they are actually making a Microsoft Account either). Which means if I just pull a drive out of a not booting computer those folders don't exist in the User's folder. And if the OneDrive folder is there, the data is mostly just stubs of actual files. Which means they are useless, and can be bad if the person only had a free account and it got too full and there is now data that may be lost due to those folders not "really" being present.

They know how to use these (to me) really complicated programs and media devices. They know how to automate things in cool ways. Create content or apps that I will just never wrap my mind around. So I am not over here calling them stupid and just "dunking" on them. But they don't care or just refuse to learn the basic hardware or even basic level troubleshooting (a lot is just a quick Google search away). They know how to create things, but not ask how the stuff that they use to create things works. So what will happen when the folks that know how things work are gone and all people know is how to make things that presuppose that the other things are functioning? All because the only things that get attention are whatever is new and teaching less and less the foundations. Pair that with things being so messed up that "fake it till you make it" is a real and honest mantra and means only fools will give actual credentials on their resumes.

It is all about getting a title of a job, without knowing a damn thing about what is needed to do the job. It also means so many problems that were solved before are needing to be re-solved as if it was brand new. Or things that were already being done are "innovated" by people with good BS-ing skills in obtuse ways that sound great but just add lots of busy work. To which the next "innovator" just puts things back to before and are seen as "so masterful." History and knowing how things work currently matter in making real advancements. If a coder just learns to always use functions or blobs of other projects without knowing what is in them. Then they could base basically everything on things that if are abandoned or purged will make their things no longer work.

Given how quickly "professionals" from so so many industries are just simply relying on these early AI/MLs without question. They don't verify if the information they got was factually true and can be cited from real sources. Instead of seeing that the results were made from the AI/MLs doing shit they have been taught to do. Which is to try and create things based on the "vibe" of actual data. The image generators are all about the attempts to take random prompts and compare to actual versions of things and make something kind of similar. But the text based ones are treated so differently and taken at a scary level of face value and trusted. And it is getting worse with so many "trusted" media outlets beginning to use these systems to make articles.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] sarsaparilyptus@lemmy.fmhy.ml 20 points 1 year ago

Object-oriented programming is a meme, if you can't code it in HolyC you don't need it

[-] MyFairJulia@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

If only TempleOS supported TCP/IP. Luckily there is a fork called Shrine that supports TCP/IP so bringing Lemmy there would be probably doable.

[-] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

And precisely thus we will bring sin into God's digital temple

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Knusper@feddit.de 18 points 1 year ago

Not sure, OOP should come before data structures and algorithms...

[-] dirtbiker509@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago

It does. But the meme is showing the newbie skip over everything and go straight to ML

[-] nothacking@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 year ago

IMHO, OOP is just dubious style points, but efficient data structures are far more useful.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] R2DPru@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

So tabs instead of spaces?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] GroundBeans@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

And the handrails are YouTube.

[-] admin@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago

Wouldn’t be surprised if now the steps are code and instructions provided by ChatGPT.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Presi300@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I fully understand why people would wanna skip all this stuff, but just learn html and css instead of programming at that point lol. I'd know, that's what I did...

[-] CoolBeance@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

What actually is supposed to be the ideal way to learn? Say, for someone trying to be a sysadmin

[-] failuer@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Here’s a nickel kid. Get yourself a better computer.

If you want to be a sysadmin learn Linux/Unix. Basic bash scripting might be useful down the line to help understand a bit of what’s going on under the hood.

IMHO networking would probably be a better secondary place to focus for a sysadmin track rather than OOP concepts, algorithms etc.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There isn't a singular "right way", but you need to know the basics of computer science like OOP, algorithms, and data structures if you want to be a decent programmer. Everyone has their own advice, but here's mine for whatever it's worth.

If you want to be a sysadmin, you should learn command line languages like batch, sed, and bash (or a superset language like batsh). Start simple and don't overwhelm yourself, these languages can behave strangely and directly impact your OS.

When you have a basic grasp on those languages (don't need to get too complex, just know what you're doing on the CLI), I'd recommend learning Python so you can better learn OOP and study networking while following along with the flask and socket libraries. The particular language doesn't matter as much as the actual techniques you'll learn, so don't get hung up if you know or want to learn a different language.

Finally, make sure you understand the hardware, software, and firmware side of things. I'd avoid compTIA certs out of principle, but they're the most recognizable IT certification a person can get. You need to have some understanding of operating systems, and need to understand how to troubleshoot beyond power cycling

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] admin@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There is a website called roadmap.sh which has both Skill and Role based roadmaps to learn how to program. There is no actual “SysAdmin” role path since our job can technically have several routes by itself.

I personally use Debian at my org, and found Python and Bash enough to automate small things that need to be done in a regular basis.

But if for example, you were a Windows SysAdmin you’d have to learn to use PowerShell ~ or VBS (idk if those scripts are still a thing)~ .

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Diabolo96@lemmy.fmhy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

Joke on you ! I piggyback on real programmers to do the hard work and just assemble them in ugly mishmash and voilà ! "My" app.

[-] onichama@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago

Cries in Maths and Statistics

[-] ParsnipWitch@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Well, it has pretty much always been like this. Everytime a new hype is going around a lot of people jump the bandwagon and try to use shortcuts to get a piece of the supposedly prosperous job market pie. It was like this (still is) with "data science", before that it was like this with python, before that it was web design, and so on.

With it, you have a whole industry of content creators churning out ebooks and Youtube channels, Bootcamps which promise "become a xyz in 2/30/90 days", dubious certificates on online learning platforms and a surge of freelancers on freelance websites.

Even at universities there are a lot of people who aren't interested in actually learning anymore. While I do understand, it is quite sad and frankly concerning to watch.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2023
884 points (100.0% liked)

Programmer Humor

32497 readers
413 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS