418

I tried to make it fairly realistic. Obviously I would like HSR absolutely everywhere, but a line through middle of nowhere Montana probably would not see much ridership and would come at extreme cost (especially in the mountains).

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Magister@lemmy.world 44 points 1 year ago

Imagine Montréal<->New York in 2h instead of 11h... We could go there the morning like leave at 6AM from Montreal and be in NYC at 8AM, spend the day there, and go back at like 10PM

[-] Hypnoctopus@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 year ago

Is this 11-hour figure based on driving or some type of train that already exists?

[-] Nsh@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 year ago

There is a train, it's 10 hours. And by car it's 6 hours..

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Magister@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Train that already exists, depart is at 11AM and you arrive in NYC at 10PM.

By car it's way faster, 6 or 7h iirc

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] tentphone@lemmy.fmhy.ml 36 points 1 year ago

I think you would need an east-west line further north - perhaps continue west from Omaha or Denver - to make east coast to west coast travel practical.

[-] aion@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Maybe Seattle->Spokane, Spokane->Boise->SLC->Denver, Spokane->Minneapolis.

I think there also needs to be more in Canada, Vancouver->Calgary->Winnipeg->Toronto.

[-] slicedcheesegremlin@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

I was just thinking this too, having to go all the way to LA from Washington before the rest of the country is weird, and anyone who lives in the west is screwed over by this map.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] cmbabul@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

A line from Seattle to Atlanta with big metro stops in between is would be amazing

[-] barsoap@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

IIRC I clocked that NY-LA line at something like 14 hours with medium HSR and down to 10 with the newest shit that can run on steel. In either case it's plenty fast for a sleeper train. There's also a pre-existing corridor, and, most importantly, massive population centres: A sleeper each direction each day won't nearly be enough to cover demand but that's no biggie you can spread them out and e.g. have people get up or start sleeping at Huston (allowing them to get on and off) or let them sleep through the whole of Texas. That's already three trains each giving the passengers even more possibilities.

You probably want to close the middle traverse from Colorado to Oregon and then connect to whatever the Canadians are doing east-west, but that doesn't mean that the southern corridor doesn't make sense in isolation.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] everythingsucks@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago

“I guess crossing the Rocky Mountains is impossible”

-OP

[-] VoxAdActa@kbin.social 23 points 1 year ago

For high-speed rail? Basically, yes. Unless you're into spending a couple million bucks per mile to rip out big chunks of the mountain. High speed rail can't reasonably navigate tight turns or steep grades.

[-] chansonnier@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

I’m inclined to believe you, and have to say I love to see discussion like this here on lemmy’s version of fuckcars, but curious, does anyone know what switzerland does? Afaik, they have tons of rail and tons of mountains. Is it all/mostly low-speed? Sorry if it’s a dumb question or easy to answer.

[-] Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Yes, it's low-speed. There are only a handful of HSR lines crossing the Alps, afaik, but they're generally huge, expensive projects that basically tunnel through many kilometers. For example, the Gotthard Base Tunnel is a 57-km tunnel through the Swiss Alps, but its feasible because it's connecting large population centers with large existing HSR networks on both sides.

[-] ConfidentLonely@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I also love that this community is picking up some discussions so very much thanks to @Fried_out_Kombi!

As I live in Germany, directly at the swiss border I may be able to give some insight. The West of Switzerland is quite flat in comparison to the rest, so a lot of south/north traffic goes there. Also a lot of cargo trains. (Funfact, there is a project ongoing to make the north south cargo route more useable. Renew and expand the railways. Swiss has done its part years ago but Germany has not even started)

But as he said, there are also quite some HSR lines through the alps. The swiss people are pretty good in building them, but yeah its mostly possible due to the high population density in Europe. There are also quite some slow trains in switzerland but the view is always incredible so I don't mind to much.

So yeah I think its probably not feasible to do the same in the US. At least as long we don't invent magical new tunnel construction

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

I love the Buffalo to Mexico City line

[-] hawkwind@lemmy.management 18 points 1 year ago
[-] Thcgrasscity@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago
[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago
[-] hawkwind@lemmy.management 2 points 1 year ago

That made my day and also inspired me to watch some vintage Simp-i-sone's. Thanks!

[-] hsr@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 year ago

Sorry guys I'm trying my best. 🚄

[-] FooSolo@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

You have 6 States that have no routes that go through them and a few that have cities on the edge of the border. That's at least 12 senators that would never let's this pass on the federal level. I would love to see this happen but you have to have some connection in each state to get federal support.

[-] Pwnmode@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

The green one in Wisconsin until Scott Walker wanted to make a point or something. Yet anothe thing he left smoldering when he fucked our state royally.

[-] nbafantest@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

One of the problems with this is that currently, a lot of these smaller city routes don't have a lot of demand. You could maybe get one train per weekday from Des Moines to Chicago for instance, Thats if you stopped at Iowa City, Moline/Rock Island, and maybe outside Chicago.

Same thing, like Tuscon to Albuquerque. Or any of the Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska lines.

I think if these routes existed though, there would grow demand around that route tho.

[-] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Well, last I checked there's only like six people in Montana, Idaho is full of potatoes, no one has ever willing gone to South or North Dakota and Wyoming is like a public toilet, only if you're really desperate do you ever go there.

[-] CFinley97@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This is always such an interesting topic. I remember doing a project on this in school. This would be such a nice upgrade for the public.

The tough thing is how much US rail & land is privately owned by commercial operators. Plus virtually all of that rail would need to be redone to accommodate HSR. Additionally, I think tickets would often need to be subsidized to be competitive to alternatives in many cases (some regional flights will already likely be the same price as what commercial HSR tickets would be).

The cost always makes it tough to justify versus other potential places for the government to spend its money.

Not that I wouldn't like to see it done. I think having HSR would be transformative for America in a great way.

[-] zuhayr@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Your in laws are in Idaho?

[-] ghostface@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Question? Why can't the silent majority start pushing these endeavors?

FL has bright line But I'm unaware of other HSR in the states.

[-] theatremaker@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Bright line is also expensive ($80ish for Miami to Orlando) and has caused a number of accidents so far…

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] DuckDuckGoneForGood@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I grew up in a completely non-walkable part of this country and then moved just outside of NYC and it’s been life-changing. I walk almost everywhere.

Driving is garbage.

Thank you for giving us something to dream about for the future. This country neeeeeeds to advance.

[-] TrainsAreCool@lemmy.one 3 points 1 year ago

I think I'm going to have to play some NIMBY Rails soon...

[-] ScottyShines@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Id love to have a high speed rail of not just Calgary and Edmonton, but also Fort McMurray.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Patrizsche@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago
load more comments (1 replies)

I really like it. It is well thought out. Canada could use a rail line along it's southern cities, but I'm not sure highspeed is required. I would love the Boston to So. Cal line to be the first built.

Did you use population density to decide on the cities?

[-] Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I generally tried to lay through-running lines between large cities that aren't too far apart and avoiding rough terrain as much as possible. Flat land with plenty of large cities not too far apart? Perfect for HSR. Mountains with cities few and far between? Not so much.

[-] fluke@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

NotJustBikes discusses this in this video around 4:30 onwards

https://youtu.be/REni8Oi1QJQ

The whole video is pretty good if you happen to find it interesting. Pretty much all of the counters that are useful to have in your arsenal to any type of 'iT cAnT wOrK hErE' brain-dead comments from people.

[-] fuzzzerd@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

The existing highline route, Amtrak Empire Builder, goes through north dekoda, Montana, Idaho, and Washington and it is a very heavily used route, so I'm not sure that wouldn't get usage if it existed.

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I mean I'm down for leaving Utah and Idaho disconnected from the network (and they probably like it that way too) but isn't there this big railway going through Utah already?

[-] Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah, it's just not high-speed. Not mapped are all the many other non-HSR rail lines you would expect as part of a complete system.

[-] guriinii@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Why aren't there connections to those states in north west of the map?

[-] Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

I tried to keep it semi-realistic. There's a ton of mountains and very few people east of the Cascades. Regular non-HSR trains would still run there. HSR can't handle nearly as sharp turns or nearly as steep gradients, so building HSR through mountains gets crazy expensive crazy fast. Without population density to support it, it'd probably be a boondoggle to build HSR there. Plus, the vast majority of travel is regional, so most trips in the PNW would be served quiet adequately by having that West Coast HSR line.

Of course, if the goal were to completely replace airplanes and demolish the interstate system, then HSR might make more sense.

[-] DetachablePianist@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

This immediately made me think of the boardgame Ticket to Ride

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Oh hell yeah, Terre Haute, Indiana is the Crossroads of America again. Right now we're stuck being the Methroads of America.

[-] TheDoctorDonna@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I like the one line between Edmonton and Calgary. Mostly for how accurate it would be. I live in the middle of that forest in the North West of the picture and while a passenger train technically exists, it is intentionally inconvenient for some reason- requiring at least one night stay in a National Park.

Public transport has been a nightmare for a long time but having Greyhound shut down on us made it impossible to travel anywhere without a car.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2023
418 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck Cars

9806 readers
10 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS