It's great to see the majority of workers paying for the mistakes of that big pricing fuckup that was approved by a minority of people in power. Just a normal day for capitalism, nothing to see here.
How do you expect a business to run? Every major business decision go to a vote? Or should a company that is bleeding cash not lay off anyone until the company shuts down and everyone is out of a job?
Every major business decision go to a vote?
Yes, especially when you plan to fuck over all your existing customer base, as was the case here. A lot of Unity employees knew this was a major fuck up, and would have never went with the plan
The second one. It's funny that people think this is an absurd suggestion, too.
Lmao, yeah, let's just let everyone join the unemployment line together. Big brain moves.
"If we don't do what they say they'll bring the entire economy to a halt, yes this is the best most flawless system imaginable" is definitely an objective and emotionless assessment and not ideological cowardice.
Actually there's a hidden option C!
The execs take a fucking pay cut for fucking up their company instead of subsidizing their wealth on the suffering of those who earned them that wealth.
I know I'm a little liberal on this one but anything over like 200k salaried should mean "I've done an amazing job helping the company grow"
Or should a company that is bleeding cash not lay off anyone until the company shuts down and everyone is out of a job?
Y. E. S.
This isnt as absurd as you think, its not the goddamn employees fault the execs suck ass. If there are performance issues from an employee that is different, but in general these moves are wholely driven by failure at the exec level.
So because the execs suck ass, everyone should lose their jobs instead of a fraction of the employees. Genius move.
Because the execs suck ass, everyone will lose their job eventually an yway.
Lay off a few C-Suite. Abolish golden parachutes. It's not so difficult that a company can't run for a few months without execs.
Others have already stated the second option as preferred, I'm going to offer up some more context. The obvious contemporary example of this sort of structure is a co-op. There is usually some general manager or CEO-like position that handles day-to-day operations, and major business decisions are decided by a member vote. If that is a little too on the nose, it is not uncommon to have a shareholder vote for major business changes in a more traditional, publically traded, company.
Every worker a member of the board
Still boggles my mind that Unity has 7700 employees. It's funny how Godot while having only 10(?) developers is considered good alternative for Unity.
TBF godot is open source and has over 2300 contributors on github. Still less than unity and most of those don't get paid for their work, but saying that there are only 10 developers is not true and not fair to all of the people contributing in their free time
Not all 2300 worked full time on godot tho. Most contributors either want to add a feature and leave, or bugfix and then leave. But those 7700 unity employees sounds like full time or at least part timer to me.
The 7700 wouldn't all be in roles that directly contribute to the codebase, either.
It is mind boggling to me how "high touch" business to business sales is like who do you need a dedicated account representative for every customer?
There is more to sales than just the initial contract. Each account has a CLV and its the job of the revenue teams to not only figure out what this is, but then funnel customers through the various stages of post-sales business development, product adoption growth, churn mitigation strategies...etc. to not only meet this but extend it. Sales and revenue are not just a one and done operation. When done correctly you essentially have a farming model vs a hunting one (this can be further refined with things like ICPs, funnel feedbacks...etc), but this often requires some level of continuous account touch points to maintain (gotta water the plants, keep them free of weeds, put down new fertilizer when appropriate, ensure there are no pests causing problems, weather proof the enclosure as much as possible...etc, you get the idea).
That being said though, a lot of businesses are still operating on the pre 2022 growth models or are just now catching up and trying to shift to a more sensible revenue based model, and that is leading to sheding of numbers in an (often misguided imo) attempt to not go under.
Exactly. And the unity engine is not the only product that unity makes. They have a full cloud platform with DevOps tools, Game Services like Matchmaking, Leaderboards, Ads, etc. and many more things.
Nonetheless, what the Godot Team + Community is creating as a FOSS product is absolutely amazing and i would say it's well on its way to becoming the Blender of game engines
7690 middle managers and 10 devs
I'm curious how much those 2300 contributors have actually added to the repo though. Are they the equivalent of 10 full time devs? 100? 5?
2300? Making a change to the repo is what makes someone a contributor. Sorry if I completely misinterpreted the question.
I think they meant how much code each of those contributors added to the repo. Like did 500 just add a single line? Did some of them simply fix a typo in a single string? That kinda thing.
I'm curious how much those 2300 contributors have actually added to the repo though. Are they the equivalent of 10 full time devs? 100? 5?
IE how much have the 2300 contributors added in aggregate compared to the 10 FTE?
My gut instinct is that the employees probably account for 90% of the codebase.
True. Didn't think about that.
I was digging into it because that baffled me.
It looks like Unity Software provides a lot of services related to Unity and Cloud usage of the engine. I'm guessing this is a ton of consultants.
Godot is being pushed as an alternative for indie developers who likely weren't using those services. Those services are likely being used by developers making more mainstream games like Pokemon Go and Call of Duty Mobile.
Most of their employees are likely in that realm and marketing/sales
Hoping it's not a mistake but I'm early enough in my career I'm still prepping for my first indie game and I'm currently pivoting to godot. I want to make pc and mobile titles, and I was already upset over how unity treated their customers and now they're laying off 25%... I'd rather try something else while I have time to learn
Doesn't matter, Unity is a dead man walking.
Godot FTW!!!
This actually could have been much worse. I heard they are trialing a system where they lay off one employee every time unity is installed, but luckily there have only been 1800 installs since September.
It is supposed also count prior installations, but customers haven't been have been under-reporting the numbers.
Welcome to the game development community! This is a place to talk about and post anything related to the field of game development.