508
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by registrert@lemmy.sambands.net to c/fediverse@lemmy.ml

Made by Nume MacAroon at Veganism.social https://veganism.social/@nm

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] davel@lemmy.ml 124 points 1 year ago

Some instances know their embrace, extend, extinguish history and some don’t.

[-] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 26 points 1 year ago

I still stand by that defederation as the only line of defense is a losing strategy. Keeping users siloed in Facebook's garden shouldn't be seen as a win for us.

Keeping users siloed in Facebook’s garden shouldn’t be seen as a win for us.

Sometimes the only winning move is not to play. If people hadn't federated with google's XMPP back in the day, google wouldn't have had the same level of control it had to kill XMPP as a competitor.

We need to learn from the lessons of the past, and the past has resulted in the deaths of services when federating with corporations.

[-] sintrenton@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago

"We should debate them... And defeat them on the Marketplace of Ideas." Yeah, right.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[-] davel@lemmy.ml 21 points 1 year ago

What is your definition of win? Market share? Are you thinking in capitalist terms?

Nobody is forcing those people to use Facebook, and they are welcome to come here whenever they like.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (22 replies)
[-] Nougat@kbin.social 109 points 1 year ago

The color codes and symbols aren't at all propagandist.

I mean technically, but it's not like it's trying to be subtle about it. From the page:

I believe that Facebook represents one of the gravest threats to democracies around the world [...]

The point is to discourage instances from federating with threads.

[-] GammaGames@beehaw.org 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I thought the same, then I saw the quote at the top of the page and realized it wasn’t strictly for information tracking

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] dessalines@lemmy.ml 49 points 1 year ago

Nice, props to whoever made that site.

[-] registrert@lemmy.sambands.net 23 points 1 year ago

https://veganism.social/@nm should have added in the desc.

[-] MudMan@kbin.social 46 points 1 year ago

Huh. You'd think more instances were blocking, given the amount of buzz.

Being generallky in favor of letting individual users make this call that's... mildly encouraging. Of course I happen to be in an instance that is blocking, so...

It's worth noting that this still splits Mastodon pretty much in half. That's arguably a bigger concern than anything else Meta may be doing. They may not even have to actually federate to break Mastodon, which is a very interesting dynamic.

[-] Alsephina@lemmy.ml 23 points 1 year ago

We gotta pump these numbers up

[-] EqMinMax@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Am I the one who finds X federated in the status of this website as that instance is not federated ?

It also confuses me that it says like that instance is federated.

[-] bugsmith@programming.dev 17 points 1 year ago

Yes. I get the idea, because federating with them is the "negative" option, but honestly it's just confusing and overly opinionated for an infographic.

[-] DarkThoughts@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago

X = Federated = Bad
It's not rocket science.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Levsgetso@lemmy.zip 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There seems to a mistake saying that Threads is not blocked by lemmy.zip, when we defederated them months ago.

[-] Kierunkowy74@kbin.social 21 points 1 year ago

This is not an exhaustive list. For example, Instagram Threads profiles are available from kbin.social, which is not listed here, though.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Ziggurat@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 year ago

It's somehow fun to see instance rules adding a clause about We do not federate with organization involved in Genocides

And a pitty that Meta is that Bad !

[-] forensic_potato@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

Is Lemmy.world not going to defederate from Threads? Did I miss something?

[-] atocci@kbin.social 26 points 1 year ago
[-] forensic_potato@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

Thanks so much for the link!

Time to migrate my account then ¯_(ツ)_/¯

[-] Magrath@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 year ago

That's Mastodon.world or is that the same as lemmy.world?

[-] BarrierWithAshes@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago

Same admin.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] SpaceTurtle224@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I hope LW limits federation

[-] Dadifer@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Have the admins said anything? Why are we federated with them?

[-] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 year ago

Yep. They don't care and they're going to keep federation with Facebook so "users have the choice to opt out"

Mastodon's largest instance is letting them in too

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] GammaGames@beehaw.org 17 points 1 year ago
[-] 0xtero@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago

It's a silly hashtag för instances that are in a "pact" to block Threads

[-] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 1 year ago

This is why I love DBZER0

[-] JokeDeity@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago

Not nearly enough.

[-] merthyr1831@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Good. On one hand it's good to see fediverse stuff coming mainstream, on the other hand the last thing we want is a load of celebrities and brands trying to cannibalise said fediverse as an opportunity to corner the market instead of genuinely useful resources for communication

[-] DarkSpectrum@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

If the Fediverse is truly the architecture of the future, then shouldn't it be able to stand any attempt by Meta to control it? If Meta is able to control it, then isn't it the wrong solution?

[-] csm10495@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago

You're completely right.

Defederation is silly here in my opinion. I'd personally prefer more content and more mainstream stuff. We're basically isolating ourselves. If it's so great, it'll flourish; instead we won't allow it. So much for an open community. :shrug:

We also collectively downvote people who think this which is also silly. Heck even this post is more/less to bully these instances into doing what this group wants.

Reminds me of the bad side of Reddit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] moitoi@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 year ago

So, I choose the right instances at the beginning.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2023
508 points (100.0% liked)

Fediverse

17965 readers
270 users here now

A community dedicated to fediverse news and discussion.

Fediverse is a portmanteau of "federation" and "universe".

Getting started on Fediverse;

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS