1328
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Synthead@lemmy.world 328 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Whatever happens on my browser is client side, which is hardware and software I own. I can make what I own do what I want. It's a right.

It's like Google saying that I can't skim a magazine in my home, and that I must read the ads. Google can do what they want server-side, and I'll do what I want client-side.

[-] FMT99@lemmy.world 113 points 1 year ago

They're not saying you can't have an adblocker. They're saying their software will try not to serve you their data if you do, or at least make it inconvenient.

You have a right to your computer. You do not have a right to their service.

[-] Synthead@lemmy.world 81 points 1 year ago

That's exactly what I said, yeah

[-] SendMePhotos@lemmy.world 71 points 1 year ago

Me after reading the 1st comment: "OK. True. Fair." Me after reading the 2nd comment: "OK. True. Fair." Me after reading the 3rd comment: "OK. Also true. Also fair."

[-] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 34 points 1 year ago

Me reading you:

Fourth gosh darn level of agree

I’ll never disable my PiHole or turn off ublock tho

load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] CrayonRosary@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

Google can do what they want server-side

Sure, like not sending you videos. 🤔

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] Cagi@lemmy.ca 186 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Remember when every billionaire apologist was telling us how no one would do shit like this when net neutrality was being gutted?

[-] yiliu@informis.land 115 points 1 year ago

This has nothing to do with net neutrality. Google is not an ISP. With or without net neutrality, Google could fuck with YouTube users.

[-] atrielienz@lemmy.world 66 points 1 year ago

Technically false. Google is an ISP. But they aren't using their position as an ISP to slow down traffic or fast track other traffic in this instance so no it has nothing to do with net neutrality.

[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

Only if we narrow our scope to the commonly thought of types of net neutrality. I think if we had foreseen intentionally treating browsers differently, this type of thing would have 100% been rolled into that original conversation about net neutrality. It's the same idea: artificially modifying a web experience for capitalist gain.

I personally wish it could be illegal for them to do this, but I do think it would be really hard to enforce such a law.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] alekwithak@lemmy.world 50 points 1 year ago

Not just YouTube. Now I have to say I'm not a robot when searching from my phone because I dare use a VPN that's not theirs.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] superduperenigma@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I still remember Ajit Pai's dumbass teeth as he smugly insisted that you'll still be able to "'gram' your food" before covering a Chipotle bowl in a mountain of flaming hot Cheetos and an ocean of Sriracha. And that was one of the least irritating moments of that video. That whole fucking video was basically "you can still waste time with your bread, circuses, and creature comforts, you fucking peasants, now shut up and let the corporations do their thing" while ignoring every legitimate criticism of the decision to gut NN.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] RTRedreovic@feddit.ch 143 points 1 year ago

This is a good time to make aware about an amazing privacy-centric & user-friendly alternative - Peertube. It is not a big network as of now but the benefits it provides over YouTube are large - it is a part of the fediverse. Of course, only through increasing participation will the network become bigger.

If you still wish to use YouTube, you can try third party front ends like Invidious or Piped on the browser; NewPipe(Also is a front end for Soundcloud, media.ccc.de, Peertube & Bandcamp) or LibreTube on Android.

If you only browse YT Music, you can try HyperPipe in the browser. There are many apps for it available on F-Droid, an alternative app store for Android. My personal pick is ViMusic.

[-] Da_Boom@iusearchlinux.fyi 39 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Peertube is a great platform. And it has its uses. But it will never compete with YouTube - YouTube's business model actively incentivises and pays people to post media to their platform.

Peertube is more likely to be to be the opposite - donation run, and given videos are exponentially more expensive to host, it's highly unlikely that creators will receive any compensation for their work. In fact it's more likely theyl be in the list of people donating to the platform (or they'll own the platform outright)

While this might be fine if a creator makes the majority of its money elsewhere, via patreon or sponsors or whatever, it's not going to work out for any aspiring or up and coming YouTube who has yet to become big enough to start diversifying their income base.

[-] megrania@discuss.tchncs.de 31 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I feel like people mistake YouTube for a video hosting solution.

But that's not the point.

  • YouTube a huge archive of content that accumulated over the past 17 years.
  • YouTube is a content suggestion machine. Discoverability is a key aspect.
  • YouTube sets an incentive by allowing people to monetize their content.
  • ...

So, if the only thing you're looking for is a video hosting solution, then, yes, PeerTube might be an alternative. In the same way uploading videos to your own webspace would be, and Vimeo also still exists.

But for all the other stuff, YT is, unfortunately, unmatched, and probably will be for a while ...

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 133 points 1 year ago

Well that's only fair.

It already made it worse for non-adblock users.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] namingthingsiseasy@programming.dev 126 points 1 year ago

However bad they may make it, it can't possibly be worse than it is for non-adblock users.

But hey, if they want to torpedo their own services, have at it. It's not like they have a reputation for it or anything....

[-] MaxVoltage@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago

i am more worried about the old videos wipe thats coming soon

Sooo many peoples uploaded memories and documentaries are going to becone lost forever

[-] zovits@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

Wait, what?

load more comments (27 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Godort@lemm.ee 107 points 1 year ago

I don't know why they think this change is going to get anyone to switch.

5 seconds of nothing is still way better than a minute-long ad

[-] narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee 60 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They want to sell their Premium subscription. They want you to compare 5 seconds of nothing versus "0" seconds of nothing. That being said, I think uBlock Origin with up-to-date filter lists completely eliminated this delay for me.

[-] Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

At work, we can't log into personal accounts. And my job isn't going to buy YouTube premium. So now any video tutorials on YouTube is getting impossible to watch.

This has now triggered a bunch of lazy developers into action in my entire company. Even our internal newsletters are explaining how to use adblock.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[-] EdyBolos@lemmy.world 74 points 1 year ago

Fuck Google and YouTube, but the title is misleading, and it's an article from three weeks ago. I'm quite surprised that this post is so upvoted, and nobody else flagged this before.

load more comments (20 replies)
[-] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 67 points 1 year ago
[-] Frellwit@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

By doing that you're wasting bandwidth on all the CDNs that hosts ALL your filter lists. Updating the Quick fixes list should be enough. (Which updates every 5 hours automatically on uBO 1.54).

How to manually update Quick Fixes (Manual updates push back automatic updates.)

  • Click 🛡️ uBO's icon
  • the ⚙ Dashboard button
  • the Filter lists pane
  • the 🕘 clock icon next to the uBlock filters – Quick fixes list
  • the 🔃 Update now button.
load more comments (3 replies)

Are they, though? I’ve been using Firefox and uBlock Origin for years and I’ve not had an issue other than needing to manually update my filters three times since this started.

[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 46 points 1 year ago

Yeah, however "worse" it is for adblock users, it can't compare to how awful the ads are.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] mawkishdave@lemmy.world 60 points 1 year ago

And freetube is making it so much better.

load more comments (16 replies)
[-] MonkderZweite@feddit.ch 42 points 1 year ago

Weren't adblocker-blockers judged going against gdpr?

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] onlinepersona@programming.dev 34 points 1 year ago

Great, I'll use it less if that's the case 🤷

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] TransSynthesist 33 points 1 year ago

By the looks of these default recommended videos, Youtube is great for bigots and authright traitors.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Kakaofruchttafel@feddit.de 32 points 1 year ago

I mean they've also consistently been making YouTube worse for everyone not using Adblock, so it's only fair.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] FlavoredButtHair@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago

We'll still figure out ways to get around ads. So suck it Google.

[-] grayman@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago

As a premium subscriber, it's definitely gotten worse for me over the last month. Whatever they're doing on the back end, it's pretty terrible.

[-] Wogi@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago

I'm not sure what the hell is going on at YouTube but I've noticed a significant drop in decent videos being recommended, and a huge uptick in videos I've already seen showing up at the front of the feed. Probs gonna drop it when the price picks up and just go to nebula.

[-] Fades@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

Why are you paying your abuser

[-] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 37 points 1 year ago

Honestly: I'd rather pay for YT and pirate Netflix.
The amount of Entertainment I get from YT exceeds the scale of Netflix and I use it daily at 2-3h per day.

And while yes, it's free, I can also support the creators with a better click price than a regular click.
Is it a better solution then the respective patreon/whatever? Nope
Do I want to pay 5€/month or video each time? Fuck no. I am not king Midas.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] anarchy79@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

WHAT?! I didn't believe it for a second when the whole planet immediately noticed at the same time!

But then again, they DID admit it. Which means they have nothing to hide! And that's transparent, and bold. We should reward companies for doing the right thing. Not only criticize them when they didn't do wrong!

Tinkle Fingerent!

load more comments (12 replies)
[-] shirro@aussie.zone 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Long time family premium user (household of parents and kids). Anything Youtube do to preserve their revenue within reason doesn't bother me too much as long as they don't reduce the split with quality creators. If they were successful with all this bullshit perhaps they wouldn't have needed to notify me that subs are almost doubling next year. My guess is all they are doing is fucking things up for everyone. It is only going to get worse if their premium subscription base reduces. They should be pricing premium as an alternative to ad-blockers but instead they are pushing people including premium subscribers towards ad-blockers.

I already have ad-blockers and apps for circumventing youtube ads. Not using them in favour of a fairly priced (to me) subscription was a choice but sadly one Google seems to be discouraging.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 year ago

*Laughs with RSS feeds, Invidious redirects, Newpipe and Sponsorblock.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2023
1328 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

60042 readers
2626 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS