614
submitted 11 months ago by throws_lemy@lemmy.nz to c/fuckcars@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 138 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Car brains are out in force for this thread, lol.

Apparently, if you can't transit products by car or truck, directly to the front-door of every business, the city will collapse.

[-] Naich@kbin.social 77 points 11 months ago

That there are cities that have actually done this doesn't seem to stop them insisting it's impossible.

[-] makyo@lemmy.world 31 points 11 months ago

Something I think is sort of ironic is that in my neighborhood most of the last mile delivery happens on bike. This isn't because of a lack of automobile infrastructure but because there are too many automobiles. Nowhere to park or even idle the van for a short time.

I do also suspect it's more convenient for the delivery person to hop off a bike at each stop than it would be to park a car and get out etc.

If I were a city planner I'd integrate that system into my strategy. Ripping out every road is of course hyperbole and clickbait, but ripping out every other road seems like a no brainer. But I seriously doubt converting 3/4 or more of the roads for autos into pedestrian/bike/tram/greenspace would shake things up too bad. Just make sure to keep main arteries open for automobiles and ensure there's centralized parking garages (street parking is a blight) within a decent walking distance and I think people who need to have a car in the city will get used to it fast.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
[-] FarceOfWill@infosec.pub 33 points 11 months ago

Fuck_cars on Lemmy is great, I feel like I'm really fighting for the future every time I come here.

On Reddit it was just people trying to out meme each other

[-] WldFyre@lemm.ee 19 points 11 months ago

Fuck_cars on Lemmy is great, I feel like I'm really fighting for the future every time I come here.

Lol

[-] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 12 points 11 months ago

These people also forget that "delivery trucks allowed" is common. Cutting out 95% of cars and leaving delivery vehicles is fine.

load more comments (30 replies)
[-] grue@lemmy.world 73 points 11 months ago

ITT: trolls seizing upon a clickbait headline and out-of-context quote in order to make blatantly delusional strawman arguments.

[-] Shalakushka@kbin.social 35 points 11 months ago

It's literally two idiots contorting into ludicrous shapes just to stay mad about this. It's wild.

WHAT ABOUT THE TRUCKS???? I am going to quote one clause of the article over and over to prove I didn't read it and get mad at people who suggest that anything could change in any way, ever! Trucks are part of human DNA and the moment an 18 wheeler can't smog up your back yard is when we have all lost our freedumb!!!

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] HaggierRapscallier@feddit.nl 41 points 11 months ago

Gentle reminder: This site is basically a tabloid at this point and should not be used as a serious source. If you have to, at least use an archived version.

[-] homoludens@feddit.de 32 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I can't read the article (paywall), but it seems to me that there might be a distinction between road and street that some people in this thread don't know about.

[-] FarceOfWill@infosec.pub 19 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I'll quote the main bit, standard problems and he's not wrong about the solutions. Why should London residents put up with rich out of London drivers polluting where they live? There is a tube and train already. Cutting down the number of routes for through traffic and turning the old roads into parks would be great. And exactly what is already happening in places with ltns

"He cited a north London councillor who described traffic as an “invasive species” that “swamps all other types of transport”. Up to 80 per cent of people living on arterial routes in urban areas did not own cars, with most of the pollution being caused by motorists driving into and through their communities.

Pointing to the “greening” of city centres such as Seoul and Utrecht, he said: “We should start changing our cities and actually start thinking about ripping out road infrastructure and turning them into green spaces or green transport corridors. We have to look beyond traffic.”

This needed to be combined with a drive to get people out of their cars and into walking, cycling and using public transport, which would not only help tackle climate change but also improve health and so reduce pressures on the NHS."

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] DarkMessiah@lemmy.world 20 points 11 months ago

Not a horrible idea if you have solid, simple, and actionable plans to replace them with robust, simple, and effective public transport options. Otherwise… yeah, a bit too far.

[-] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 10 points 11 months ago

Uh huh, and what about material delivery to stores, restaurants, &etc in the city? What about postal service?

We should absolutely invest more in public transit, but light rail and buses are not logistics solutions.

[-] Aidinthel@reddthat.com 18 points 11 months ago

Trains carry cargo all the time. I don't think it's too crazy to suggest light rail be adapted to do the same.

load more comments (40 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml 18 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Nimby crash course, vocabulary edition!

Roads in the 21st century incarnation of English almost always refer specifically to car infrastructure.

Streets are not the same as roads, it describes the space between two rows of properties. Modern streets typically contain a road for cars, but also sidewalks, trees, gardens, lounge spaces, etc. There's a reason it's called street food and not road food, because they're selling on the streets and not in the middle of the roads where they'll get run over.

Every time something like this gets brought up, you always get Nimbys screeching how this will evict everyone from their homes or whatever, and I think it's because they think removing roads means also removing the streets themselves, when in reality it means the streets get restored and become much more welcoming and people friendly.

[-] curiousPJ@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago

Wow, post is getting a lot of traction. Wish some of the actual actionable ones had the same level of activity

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2023
614 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck Cars

9580 readers
362 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS