2807
(page 5) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] yokonzo@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

I'm out of the loop, what did the SCOTUS do now?

[-] zeppo@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

https://www.scotusblog.com/2023/06/supreme-court-rules-website-designer-can-deny-same-sex-couples-service/

A six-justice majority agreed that Colorado cannot enforce a state anti-discrimination law against a Christian website designer who does not want to create wedding websites for same-sex couples because doing so would violate her First Amendment right to free speech.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] alternativeninja@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 2 years ago

They are only hurting themselves. Let them have at it

[-] Notbhavn@lemmy.fmhy.ml 4 points 2 years ago

I think this is ok. It’s how the market works. If you have enough people who agree with your stance, then you’ll survive, if not, you fail. Transversely, if you are trying to make a profitable business, you remove all roadblocks from a consumer who wants to do business with you.

[-] TheDeadGuy@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

Are you saying that minorities should not be protected?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] x4740N@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

The more I see news about the United States the less I'm surprised

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2023
2807 points (100.0% liked)

Malicious Compliance

20916 readers
1 users here now

People conforming to the letter, but not the spirit, of a request. For now, this includes text posts, images, videos and links. Please ensure that the “malicious compliance” aspect is apparent - if you’re making a text post, be sure to explain this part; if it’s an image/video/link, use the “Body” field to elaborate.

======

======

Also check out the following communities:

!fakehistoryporn@lemmy.world !unethicallifeprotips@lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS