2807
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Psychlops@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago

Such an unbelievable ruling, but this is really the best possible response. If conservatives thought they were persecuted before…

[-] HunterBidensLapDog@infosec.pub 18 points 2 years ago

Now that #SupremeCourt says we can discriminate, I'm trying to figure out what to tag content. #NoMAGA #NoRepublicans #QueerOnly #NoBreeders #NoChristians

My understanding is that businesses can refuse services which conflict with their beliefs, morals, etc, not broadly refuse to serve people

So you can't refuse someone for being a MAGA clown, but you could refuse to print MAGA shirts for a customer

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] rustyfish@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago

Beautiful. I love it.

[-] Dlg@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago

Not cool for either party.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] bren42069@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 years ago

inb4 get woke go broke, rip their business. not a good look in the bud light era

[-] GlitzyArmrest@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago

Who the fuck even cares about bud light? Are you twelve?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2023
2807 points (100.0% liked)

Malicious Compliance

20869 readers
37 users here now

People conforming to the letter, but not the spirit, of a request. For now, this includes text posts, images, videos and links. Please ensure that the “malicious compliance” aspect is apparent - if you’re making a text post, be sure to explain this part; if it’s an image/video/link, use the “Body” field to elaborate.

======

======

Also check out the following communities:

!fakehistoryporn@lemmy.world !unethicallifeprotips@lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS