Well, since I never took time to master phone magic, now they are going to give me a push. Thanks, I guess
How is this going to work for the companies that have internal only apps like time clocks or schedulers. Can they pay the fee and have their apps hidden from the PlayStore or are they all fucked?
Adb will continue to work
Maybe i freaked out a bit too early. Still going to move away from Google Android personally but the business i work for is way too large to even attempt.
because many People who loves privacy
almost 12 of us ... i jest but seriously, everyone using Apple and >90% of Android users don't care. Google knows this and they just bang on about this being best for Android users to ameliorate any concerns around governance issues.
Even many supposed staunch, so called privacy advocates, will complain they can't change because banking or some such, so they stick with the status quo as every minor inconvenience is seen as an insurmountable wall.
So i expect some bloviating initially and then acceptance. In 5 years, no shits given (headphone jack, expandable storage saw the same sort of thing)
tl;dr press x for doubt (x)
I was doing Android development recently and apparently the official SDK builds needed to build the app aren't FOSS, and actually FOSS versions are difficult to get. I still can't wait until Linux phones are a thing, Android is such a shitshow nowadays and even GrapheneOS is still at the mercy of Google's ecosystem. (also still no aarch64-linux support for the build tools either)
Motorola will release a phone with GrapheneOS in 2027, it would be a good pick.
Ironically they're the top government surveillance camera manufacturer where I live on deflock
Don't forget about the new automatic Google play services check that app developers can enable with a single click on build. That automatically blocks the app from working on any degoogled ROM
So, did I understood correctly that just getting pixel with GrapheneOS is way out?
Sooooo the way out, is to pay Google a thousand dollars for their phone......
If that's a bother you could get it secondhand
Still props up Google's phone business.
Yes. Bonus if you get it used just make sure it's completely unlocked. A carrier phone is not unlocked and is a pain in be butt to get unlocked. I can't remember what instance it's on but there's a graphene community.
Edit it's !grapheneos@lemmy.ml I know some instances don't interact with .ML though
So, did I understood correctly that just getting pixel with GrapheneOS is way out?
I can't really say anything about that, sorry. I'm not familiar with GrapheneOS or Google Pixel. As far as I know, Play Services can apparently be installed in a sandbox?.... but I didn't quite get it either. So I can't say whether the system will be affected by Google's rules. Sorry I can't help further.
Is there an alternative to Android and iOS in the US? I'm trying to degoogle but what other phones are there?
Graphene
Doesn't that only support phones made specifically by Google?
Yes but you buy a second hand phone so you don't give money to these rats.
Others are coming from what I've heard, but yeah, currently only Pixels have the required hardware. It's still an awesome OS if you can find a decent second hand pixel.
Whether in the US or elsewhere, no, unless you're willing to make major concessions (like not having banking apps)
The best you can do is a de-googled android, but even that is getting tricky with some apps
Can you advertise f-droid in an app on play store? Or offer free features on a link that teaches how to f-droid yourself?
Fdroid is exactly what they're about to block
Not necessarily and there are ways to install it waiting a day, then it won't be enforced on a per app basis like they plan.
I tried to open up an issue (and did a PR) suggesting a developer strike as a tactic (IE open source devs adding their names to a list to promise to remove our apps from google play if developer ID goes through) on the KeepAndroidOpen repo. As a dev whose made many android apps and have them on both f-droid and google play, I thought this would mean something.
The maintainers of that repo have been ignoring me to death since April. I was told by the maintainer that the project was "leaderless", but in reality it seems they're very opposed to a developer strike, otherwise my PR would've gotten more attention.
If you or somebody will create this initiative, please create a post about it on Lemmy! (Or ping me here if you'll remember.) It's a good initiative! Worth the attention. I'd also be curious to know which developers have committed to the strike and which haven't.
Is there a change to an app in Google TOCs that can get folk to get app from F-droid?
For example: "Free features for this app only available on play. New features and enhancements available (paid or) for free through f-droid." Or if you cannot openly advertise in the app, "Visit our website to get enhanced features and updates" with clear documentation on how to install and permit f-droid and get app through there.
That way, big app devs can create moves to f-droid, normalising it and chipping away at googles power. The more apps, the more legimate f-droid seems to normies.
Ideally done as soon before switchover as possible. Even reach out to content creators.
It moves from protest, to protest and solution.
Must be a US based/themed online "protest"
"We want something to change"
"We aren't going to do anything drastic for the change"
"Nothing changed? Oh well!"
They almost always seem like a controlled opposition set up to make people believe, gain support (artificially at first to deter competeting protests that are more radical), but once it gets popular it doesn't accomplish anything, won't listen to ideas, input and feedback from the community and fold as soon as they aren't required.
F-Droid
F-Droid is an installable catalogue of FOSS (Free and Open Source Software) applications for the Android platform. The client makes it easy to browse, install, and keep track of updates on your device.
Matrix space | forum | IRC