119
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] devfuuu@lemmy.world 33 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I don't even understand half the words written there. Makes me happy.

[-] blimthepixie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 weeks ago
[-] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 3 points 2 weeks ago

Did they skip Fable 4?

[-] timmytbt@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 weeks ago

The original post is titled “GLM/Kimi effect”. GLM models are developed by another Chinese company Z.ai. Their latest model GLM-5.2 has been benchmarked at similar coding capability as Anthropic’s Fable 5. You can use GLM-5.2 free via chat.z.ai. Like any of the “free” offerings it is limited in context, and be sure you don’t share any personal information with it because they will use your data for training (and who knows what else). But compared to other free models (eg those available via duck.ai) it is pretty impressive.

[-] timmytbt@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago

Also GLM-5.2 is open source, so that will make Dario’s head explode too!

[-] melfie@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Sorry to be pedantic, but I think it’s important not to call these models “open source”. Open weight is the equivalent of a compiled binary that can be run locally, so you’re basically getting Windows where it’s legal to reverse engineer, not Linux. The weights are permissively licensed, so the community is still free to quantize, fine-tune, reap, etc., which is analogous to something like Tiny11. Without the training data and the pipeline code, though, if Alibaba or Moonshot decide to go closed, the community won’t be able to fork their models and meaningfully continue development.

It’s better than what we are getting from “OpenAI” or Anthropic for the moment, but these are Chinese, for-profit companies that are no more altruistic than Google or Meta, and their open weight LLMs are just as likely to go closed as Llama or Gemma if the companies deem that to be in their best interest.

[-] timmytbt@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago

Fair enough. No one was saying they are altruistic 😉

[-] liquorice@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Especially if you know what the actual word means. In an infinite synced linked ST copyverses, Picard doesn't have enough to do the move properly about that. There was this comic about a spacesuit person holding his helmet and see themselves on the top of the helmet doing the same thing. I can't remember the line. I broke that tower a while ago and I can't remember why...

this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2026
119 points (100.0% liked)

Funny

15794 readers
548 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS