21
submitted 1 week ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net

This is, to put it mildly, not fast enough

top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] HerbGrower@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 week ago

That is kinda shit. Would be curious what my own % is. I don't even use fossil fuels directly.

[-] dharmacurious@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 week ago

I read this and immediately thought of the Rural Electrification Act in the US, and for a very brief moment I was like "wtaf, only 46% of the EU is electrified‽ Jesus!"

And then the stupid left my head and I realized what it was actually about

this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2026
21 points (100.0% liked)

Climate

8848 readers
359 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS