113
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) by curbstickle@anarchist.nexus to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

Edit 3 - further refining.

There are some rather... unique interpretations of what a promo post is, along with an important note that some people lurk. Its important though that they participate somewhere to make sure its not a drive-by ad, but its fair to say that there are users in programming, linux, and other communities whose posts would be welcomed by users here.

Its also important to users here that its not just post and disappear.

So I'm adjusting to:

Promotion posts require your active participation in selfhosting or related communities, or the post will be removed. No more than 10% of your posts or comments may be self-promotional, or your post will be removed. F/LOSS Exception: If your post is about a project that is completely open source & can be self-hosted in full without payment, your post is exempt from this rule as long as you continue to engage in comments.


EDIT 2 AT THE TOP AGAIN:

It seems there is some confusion around the term "promo posts", so I'm making another adjustment for clarity. If this is muddying the waters instead, please point that out!

Self-promotion posts advertising their product requires community participation, or they will be removed. No more than 10% of your posts or comments may be self-promotional, or your post will be removed. F/LOSS Exception: If your post is about a project that is completely open source & can be self-hosted in full without payment, your post is exempt from this rule.

I worry a bit that its getting unwieldy, so feel free to suggest options to clean up the language a bit.


EDIT AT THE TOP:

Promotional posts require community participation or they will be removed. No more than 10% of your posts or comments may be self-promotional, or your post will be removed. F/LOSS Exception: If your post is about a project that is completely open source & can be used in full without payment, it will be exempt from this rule.

Intended to clarify on "paywall" - it has to be open source and run in full locally, no one-time or subscription-locked payment for features, to qualify. Donations don't count as that doesn't limit use, while something like Kavita (which has non-free features behind a subscription, despite the base being open source) would not have the benefit of exemption. The rule intent hasn't changed here, just the wording on the exemption limitations.


I've gotten through (I believe) all the comments in the meta thread. So I want to establish a few things, first being a better definition on spam.

Spam is not "I don't like this and its a paid product" or "I don't like this and they used AI/LLMs".

Spam would generally be considered:

  • Mass-posting - Posting the exact same post across a bunch of of different communities, rapidly.
  • Repetitive Content (aka karma farming) - repeatedly submitting old popular content. I'll note that this is completely irrelevant on lemmy, this was more of a reddit issue due to karma.
  • Bot Activity / AI Abuse - Using scripts/bots/gen AI to automate posts and comments.
  • Unsolicited DMs - Mass private messages or chats to users, completely unsolicited

I'd say anything other than that deserves a followup rule, and this definition should go in the sidebar.

Regarding the promotional posts themselves, I think something like the 10% rule makes sense - no more than 10% of the account should be self-promotional material or comments within the community.

I do think it makes sense to include an exception for 100% free/libre open source projects. Partially open projects with a closed (paid) component should be subject to the 10% rule. So what I propose as the rule would be:

Promotional posts require community participation or they will be removed. No more than 10% of your posts or comments may be self-promotional, or your post will be removed. F/LOSS Exception: If your post is about a project that is completely open source & without any paywalls, it will be exempt from this rule.

Questions, comments, clarifications, and harsh criticisms are welcomed in the comments. As a reminder from my intro post, and because of some comments in the other thread, I will mention:

There are people on both sides of the keyboards, so please be respectful of others.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago

I'm a lurker, I potentially comment but usually there is not much to add when the pros have posted, so if I'd try to promote my secure, takedownsafe P2P sharing protocol (if people started using it, everyone could have a web-space, backups, a "drop-box", an online presence, and more), it'd be kicked?

I'm just trying to understand where I am, the overall rule is completely understandable.

[-] curbstickle@anarchist.nexus 3 points 22 hours ago

No, you're pretty active in general, so it would be left up.

But I see what you're saying, it would be better to amend the community part. The 10% should really be said as your activity and not specific to the community.

I'm going to make an edit, thanks

[-] IsoKiero@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 day ago

I worry a bit that its getting unwieldy, so feel free to suggest options to clean up the language a bit.

I would just keep it simple: "Self promotion for your product is allowed, but this is not an advertising platform. Be sensible and participate to community. Abuse will result in post removal."

I don't think it really helps to place any arbitary limit as it might just result on spamming low-effort comments so that your "quota" stays under the 10% rule and also posting about your fantastic FOSS project daily could be equally annoying. That 10% rule could be useful when deciding if something should be removed and obviously free projects should have more relaxed "limits", but in general what counts as abuse can be decided by community feedback.

[-] curbstickle@anarchist.nexus 4 points 1 day ago

That would be effectively the same as no rule at all, so I'm going to have to say that is not an option given the recent meta thread.

The issue is not repeat posts from specific posters, or even repeats - they just aren't happening. What is happening, and caused the thread, were posts that were basically looking for beta/qa testers for their closed source app.

So "Please don't be spammy" is not enough. What the majority asked for was strong limits or an outright ban.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] skankhunt42@lemmy.ca 2 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Self-promotion posts advertising their product requires community participation, or they will be removed. No more than 10% of your posts or comments may be self-promotional, or your post will be removed. **F/LOSS Exception**: If your post is about a project that is completely open source & can be self-hosted *in full* without payment, your post is exempt from this rule.

How about

Promotional posts advertising a product requires community participation. If more than 10% of your history is promotional it will be removed. F/LOSS Exception: If a project is completely open source and can be self-hosted in full without payment, it is exempt.

Edit: we've come full circle. Let's just do 'don't be a shill' and be done with it....

[-] Mordikan@kbin.earth 26 points 1 day ago

I think 10% self-promotion is a very fair rule. It enforces the idea that if you are going to take from the community that you also give something back.

As someone who is partially self-hosted, I think that will help keep ads from muddying the waters when I'm searching posts for setup suggestions.

[-] carlnewton@feddit.uk 11 points 1 day ago

I saw the other thread and decided not to comment because there the conversation was looking pretty contentious, and I didn't want to put a target on my back, but as somebody who almost exclusively posts about my project on Lemmy, I thought that this might be a good opportunity to explain myself.

Due to my project being FOSS, I'm thankful that this 10% rule doesn't apply to me right now because I really don't think I could provide anything useful by spouting my opinions. I do look at questions to see if there's anything I can answer but the community is already great at that and most have more experience and knowledge of hosting infrastructure etc. I don't feel that I have a great deal of insight into what makes for a good self hosting setup, but I have a passion for writing open source software that can be self hosted, and this is the way that I feel I can contribute something meaningful.

I feel that when I post about my project, I am contributing. I'm telling you that it exists, it's free and you're welcome to try or leave it. I do try to keep it relevant so as not to hit anyone over the head with it, and I've put the detailed posts into their own community. Nobody is going to find out that some of these self hosted applications exist if they aren't told about them.

[-] curbstickle@anarchist.nexus 10 points 1 day ago

I feel that when I post about my project, I am contributing.

This is specifically the reason why the exemption would exist - because it is a contribution to the community. You don't have a paywall impacting use, the whole thing is just something being shared to others.

[-] SuspiciousCarrot78@aussie.zone 3 points 1 day ago

Many, many years ago, I worked for a company that would do leaflet drops (junk mail). People would complain. I pointed out that they were essentially spamming people with unsolicited junk. Their retort was "We don't see it as junk; we're informing potential customers".

Dunno. Pretty sure it was just wasting a lot of paper and generating some ill will. ICBW

I guess it depends on what this space is. Is it a (virtual) wood worker's get together, where journeymen pool knowledge and help each other out? Or is it something else? Is there a needle to thread here?

Whatever it is, if we never get another "I made X...here's the problem this solves...curious if anyone else..." AI ghost written "pick me, pick me", I will be very greatful.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Tolstoy@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago

Nice to see the changes, but may I ask if tagging could be beneficial?

Surely it would help to sort out self promotion, help requests and informational posts.

Also, since we're all in the lemmy-bubble, a lot of people may despise vibe-coded projects, at least it looks/feels like it, so it may be worth tagging project with AI code?

I'm maybe narrow-minded, but please enlighten me^^

[-] SuspiciousCarrot78@aussie.zone 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Re: AI tags. I disagree, for reasons I outlined here

https://lemmy.ml/post/48724623/26190950

TL;DR: in 2026, assume ALL projects have AI assist. Then do your due diligence.

[-] curbstickle@anarchist.nexus 1 points 20 hours ago

Really doesn't address the issue at all.

Because its not just user due diligence, but what the comment threads become.

This is a discussion for another round though, not for this rule.

[-] SuspiciousCarrot78@aussie.zone 2 points 19 hours ago

We might be talking past each other here or actually agreeing.

But yes, this belongs in a separate [META] thread. It's a discussion that needs to be had IMHO.

[-] curbstickle@anarchist.nexus 1 points 18 hours ago

You are welcome to make one, but to note I am avoiding inundating the community with discussions, so I won't be making one (or a rule post followup like this) until next week. Trying to avoid having too many at once.

load more comments (13 replies)
[-] curbstickle_lw@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

I actually do want tagging of some sort, I think its a sensible approach overall. I think its a quick way to identify that your project used AI and people can quickly filter, per your example.

That said, I think that should be a separate item, and I don't want to inundate with stickies either. That was going to be my next "oh look a mod is annoying us with his opinion again" post, but then we ended up seeing a ton of promo content this week. I'm trying to stick to a mod post every week or two so everyone has a chance to see and respond to things.

That said, if you want to get that discussion ball rolling, feel free to make a meta post about it of course!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2026
113 points (100.0% liked)

Selfhosted

60093 readers
744 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam.

  3. Posts here are to be centered around self-hosting. Please ensure it is clear in your post how it relates to self-hosting.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or git here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title.

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS