494
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] mech@feddit.org 43 points 5 days ago

Drone tech has had exactly the same effect machine guns and precise artillery had in WW1: an advantage of the defense over the offense, which turns the war into one of attrition.
Neither side is able to do sweeping maneuvers and break through defensive lines until the other side's ability to fight is completely exhausted.
This war won't end before Putin is gone, one way or the other.

[-] VinegarChunks@lemmus.org 11 points 4 days ago

Why would that be, that drone warfare advantages defense?

WW1 era weapons advancements like machine guns advantaged defense, because these new weapons were not easily mobile. But drones are extremely mobile.

[-] bitwize01@reddthat.com 20 points 4 days ago

The main difference between WWI and Today's trench warfare the the level of intelligence available, combined with the ability to precision-strike.

It's interesting because drones are very mobile, able to be deployed close to the front, and extremely deadly, but simultaneously limited. The heavier payload ones can also be longer range, but counter-UAV technology (mostly jamming) makes these harder to use. In comparison, the shorter-range drones can be sent via cable - impossible to jam, but limited flight distance due to the trailing wire + weight.

The application of drones on the battlefield also favors the defender. The small-payload drones are exceptional at taking out moving vehicles and light infantry, and overhead imagery (via drone or satellite) is nearly omnipresent. With neither side able to secure complete air power, the normal target softening approach of airstrikes followed by troop movement isn't viable, and then drones take out even the most spread-out groups moving forward. The result is that the doctrinal 3:1 attacker ratio that favors defenders is even more lopsided with drones. I fear that we'll see a greatly increased use of autonomous weaponry as a result, which is extremely dangerous for humanity.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] mech@feddit.org 11 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Why would that be, that drone warfare advantages defense?

For an offensive action you need to concentrate enough forces and material in one area to achieve a breakthrough.
In Ukraine, there is now a "grey area" between the fronts which neither side controls but is permanently patrolled by drones, similar to WW1's "no-mans-land".
It's up to 20-30km wide, and any vehicle entering it is destroyed by drone swarms.
Crossing it on foot takes up to a week, and less than 10% make it through alive.
This makes it impossible to bring heavy equipment to the actual front line for an assault, or even re-supply your soldiers hiding in trenches there.

[-] lemmydividebyzero@reddthat.com 51 points 5 days ago

That will change. The first 1560 days oft a 3 days special military Operation are always the hardest!!!111

[-] Draegur@lemmy.zip 10 points 5 days ago

oh yes. it'll change alright. it'll change to russia losing even more territory ;p

putin is sure to announce one day that ukraine taking back crimea and crushing all russian forces within its borders will have "put them right where we want them!" and that it was all part of his 'brilliant' strategic planning.

[-] PixelatedSaturn@lemmy.world 86 points 5 days ago

Brilliant! Ukraine is today in a better position than at any time before in the war. I hope eu can continue to increase support and by doing so create a new European defence paradigm with Ukraine at it's core.

load more comments (39 replies)
[-] Draegur@lemmy.zip 86 points 6 days ago

send those orcs back home to russia

preferably alive, but in a box if they insist upon it.

[-] Lileath 17 points 5 days ago

Why is stuff like this allowed but if I were to call for the death of every israeli soldier I would probably get banned?

[-] PhoenixDog@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago

I've seen "Death Death To The IDF" on here plenty of times. I also don't believe that wishing death on people who participate in unmitigated genocide should be frowned upon.

[-] Lileath 9 points 4 days ago

But they said they wanted the russian soldiers to die, not the russian military to be dissolved. "Death to the IDF" is against the institution IDF not singular soldiers.

And don't forget the dehumanising language which certainly would have gotten me banned if I said the same about Israelis (at least on lemmy.world).

[-] Draegur@lemmy.zip 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

To be fair i DID SAY preferably alive so it's literally true that i did the opposite of call for their death :p They need to go home though. Back home to Russia. Not Ukraine.

That said, I DO IN FACT believe the Jewish peoples should have a safe nation to live in. ISRAEL IS NOT SUCH A PLACE. They should go back to Europe and stop trying to colonize indigenous people. Or hell, I would LOVE for them to live right here in New England! I will in fact NOT shoot rockets at them because I want them to live in peace and safety HERE, FAR AWAY FROM PALESTINE

[-] doben@lemmy.ml 6 points 4 days ago

To be fair, YOU DID SAY „orcs“ to describe Russians, that‘s dehumanization and a type of othering called Russophobia.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] hamid@crazypeople.online 18 points 4 days ago

ITT: People uncritically reading Ukrainian state propaganda saying the same thing it has been saying since the beginning of the war and has to say in order to maintain its funding sources and willing partners.

Look I'm not just a ml who loves Russia, I am just someone who reads a story like this and sees it for what it is- state propaganda saying state propaganda. It is pretty funnysad the same people who will cheer this article will look at RT and scream about how it is Ruzzian state lies.

This is a war. You can't trust either sides propaganda. This is not independent, not verified and not really journalism

[-] PixelatedSaturn@lemmy.world 22 points 4 days ago

Oh no, you so smart. We so stupid. Praise you.

😂

People know what's the deal. Especially people here. Things have changed, that's not news, you can read that in European newspapers and you can read it between the lines in Russian ones.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Gorilladrums@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago

That may be, but he still right. The frontlines are proof. Russia has failed to capture significant amount of territory in 3 over years. All the changes have been comically minor relative to the manpower and resources used, and so far this year, Russia has actually been losing more territory than they captured.

[-] auzy1@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

It was a special operation at the beginning. It's still going.

I think it's safe to say the war isn't going how Russia wants it to, or zelensky would have been replaced/killed by now

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] brem@lemmy.world 75 points 6 days ago

Take it all and do better for the people within

Slava Ukraini 🇺🇦

[-] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 9 points 5 days ago

wont be satisfied until crimea is theres again. China can chip and retak historic lands, "norther manchuria", although they are pretty much taking over russia economically(through thier natural resources in thier remote regions.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 10 points 5 days ago

is that why RUSSIA " is researching ways of forcing the territories they already hold to be permanent" recently.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 01 Jun 2026
494 points (100.0% liked)

World News

56404 readers
1865 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS