There's no story of Tom Steyer where he's not in some way a fundamentally flawed person with questionable motivations.

He wants to change the world for the better? Cool. He has $2.4B. Spend most of that on good deeds and candidates whose only shot at enacting change to society is their voice and hard work. He's had the power to change the world the whole time. But Instead of doing that, he's just doing sequential vanity runs. And this time he's got a shot.

To be clear, he can still be the best choice in a bad field, but he's just not a good admirable guy. There are no good billionaires. And it's really sad if he's the best CA can hope for.

There are better people out there who could have led the most powerful state into a better future. But they were blocked by obscurity or financial barriers or never having the freedom to train for leadership. If only there was an altruistic man with a lot of money who could have spent his time finding people like that and removing those obstacles.

But no. Dragons are dragons. Even the seemingly nice ones.

Ugh I don’t like billionaires.

Unexpected from Robert Reich

Why are progressives all making asses of themselves to endorse a billionaire for California?

Katie Porter is at least more aligned with them if I recall correctly.

Anyway, vote green or socialist.

Steyer is the only candidate who has said he’d vote for the billionaire wealth tax, and he’s also said we need to go even further. Under his revenue plan, he’d raise taxes on corporations and other billionaires to fund schools and healthcare.

Don't believe billionaires. The rich are inherently untrustworthy which is how they got rich. Tom Steyer is a liar.

No.

I plan on looking up a few things before the election but I haven't quite checked yet. The main thing I'd avoid is having the two Republicans taking the skits due to Dems spreading the vote too much. Is there still a risk of that?