133
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by R1x38rexrper@lemmy.ml to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world
top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Cyber@feddit.uk 5 points 1 hour ago

Looks like an interesting project, but I just don't understand it's use case.

I use Keepass and I just copy the (different) email address I used to register for a site into the username field and I'm done.

No hosting required, no additional email server, etc. just credentials in a fully portable file.

Is this trying to automate email based 2FA ?

[-] Kazel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 22 hours ago

Thanks but i stick to keepass. It does the job

[-] DevoidWisdom@sh.itjust.works 43 points 1 day ago

Per the github page "With the API stabilized, we aim to have AliasVault undergo a thorough security audit this stage. We have already initiated conversations with renowned cyber security companies who have taken interest in taking this on."

[-] filcuk@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 hours ago

I hope it doesn't say as I didn't bother to check - how do free projects get money for audits like this?

[-] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 40 points 1 day ago

Has this been audited? It’s easy to claim that something is secure, but there have been products that made such claims and were trivially exploitable.

[-] jay@mbin.zerojay.com 14 points 1 day ago

The Github page says they are aiming to get one done soon.

[-] dreamkeeper@literature.cafe 17 points 22 hours ago

They shouldn't claim that an effing password manager is "secure" until after they've done an audit.

I'll pass, thanks.

[-] absolutetupperware@lemmy.today 12 points 1 day ago

the true audit is time, unfortunately

[-] savvywolf@pawb.social 32 points 1 day ago

One thing that jumps out at me reading the readme is the fact that it has a built in email server. Email is hard to get right, and I'm surprised a relatively young(?) project is working on getting all the moving pieces together rather than declaring it out of scope.

It'll be interesting to see how it develops.

[-] Coolkat@slrpnk.net 4 points 23 hours ago

I'm no expert but as i understood, it's the sending part that's tricky to get right. Lots of handshake to handle, all to probably end up in a spam folder or blocked along the way. But receiving from a publicly acknowledged address ? I think it's fairly simple

[-] cron@feddit.org 1 points 13 hours ago

Even then, there are lots of edge cases with e-mail that are easy to get wrong and might become security risks.

I‘m not saying this applies to this project, this is more of a general concern.

[-] zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 23 hours ago

I would never trust a newly written email server and there is absolutely no reason not to use an already existing as a dependency to this project.

[-] prenatal_confusion@feddit.org 2 points 1 day ago

Do You know more about the email server part? I understand +addressing but this seems to be more? Do You hand a domain over and it is actually a full MX or is it just an imap client?

[-] hellmo_luciferrari@lemmy.zip 21 points 1 day ago

I'll optimistically sit back and see what comes of this. I'm happy with vaultwarden.

[-] saddlebag@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago
[-] asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago

They said VaultWarden, not BitWarden. This shouldn't affect them.

[-] lastweakness@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

It could. The removal of "transparency" indicates to me that the clients might also stop being open source at some point and Vaultwarden doesn't have its own clients.

[-] Courantdair@jlai.lu 16 points 1 day ago

Looks promising! And it's refreshing to see something that doesn't look vibecoded in a week. Couldn't find any AGENTS.md or other AI crap so I could actually try it

[-] Prathas@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 day ago

They spelled "agents" backwards to throw you off! lol jk

[-] TrumpetX@programming.dev 2 points 1 day ago

This is most definitely AI assisted. I won't say vibe coded, but this has the hallmarks.

[-] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 1 day ago

This is a claim that is meaningless. You can say it about literally any software currently in development, and there is zero way to reliably refute it.

It’s like stating your comment was AI assisted.

[-] TrumpetX@programming.dev 1 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Sort of my point, actually. Most software now I'd argue is AI assisted.

[-] slazer2au@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago
[-] B0rax@feddit.org 3 points 1 day ago

Yes! Finally one with email aliases.

[-] robocall@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Do you have thoughts on 1password?

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 hour ago

I don't know why people use these services that charge you. Just use Keepass. It's free and open source. The only disadvantage is syncthing across devices, but syncthing makes that trivial.

[-] OpenAltFinder@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

I recently started migrating away from 1Password. I was on the individual plan for almost 5 years, but this year they would raise the price. I would happily keep paying, but I just find that the quality has just gone downhill. The Firefox extension seems to freeze up quite often, or unlocking doesn't work, or sometimes it takes 10 seconds +...

The browser extension was also feeling a bit intrusive. It would often pop up for non-login fields. There's also no way to disable it for specific sites.

All in all, I just grew frustrated with it, and decided to switch to Bitwarden. I'm just on the free one, so I am missing quite a bit of functionality.

[-] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago

I’m curious why you asked this?…

[-] robocall@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Aren't both of them password managers? I guess I wonder if someone has a preference for one over the other.

[-] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago

They are, it’s just odd to bring up an unrelated software.

I do use 1Password and like it, but I couldn’t compare it to this one.

this post was submitted on 15 May 2026
133 points (100.0% liked)

Selfhosted

59236 readers
724 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

  7. No low-effort posts. This is subjective and will largely be determined by the community member reports.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS