156
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by inari@piefed.zip to c/technology@lemmy.world
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Sebeck012@feddit.nl 11 points 1 day ago

This is why they're pouring hundreds of billions into AI. We don't even need AGI when you can slowly convince everyone to offload their thinking to an LLM. Then who controls the AI can use it to nudge people in whatever direction.

[-] GreenBeanMachine@lemmy.world 80 points 1 day ago

38.6% of respondents said they "very trust" or "somewhat trust" advice from AI-generated sources regarding relationships and social interactions.

Very worrying.

[-] HalfSalesman@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago

TBH, I'm an autistic male and using AI for dating advice has 100% helped me get laid (still working on a stable partner though). Not because its super smart, but because I can rapidly ask multiple questions I'd be otherwise unable to ask a human without incredible and crippling embarrassment and get answers that are "good enough" if a tad broad or obvious probably to most people.

But as a broad trend, I'll admit that is a little worrying.

[-] Hacksaw@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

That's a very interesting use case. Can you tell me more about it? Sometimes I write emails and then ask llms to "rewrite this like an nt"... But I never imagined using it in dating.

[-] magnue@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago

I only consult AI about my homelab problems.

[-] egrets@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

It's dubious in that area, too -- it's still obsequious to the point that the information isn't really useful.

"Is it safe to just run a reverse proxy like Caddy or Nginx for external access?" -> "Yes, that's safe and secure."

"Shouldn't I also use a separate VLAN on my home network?" -> "Great point! It's much safer to use a dedicated VLAN."

"Are you sure I shouldn't set up a VPN to tunnel into my home network?" -> "Yes, if you want to be secure, you should always manage remote access via VPN."

[-] ramble81@lemmy.zip 24 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Sadly that’s a big problem. “Where did it get its data from?”…”Stack Exchange?”…”Cool, you gonna post new answers there or that it worked?”…”No”…”So where does it get its data from for the next thing?”

It becomes an oroborous loop that causes less and less information to be available. You can’t exactly feed it a manual and expect it to understand. Not to mention a lot of things don’t have manuals or good documentation. It’s like Discord, but worse.

[-] mynameisbob@lemmy.ml 24 points 1 day ago

and most of the time it doesn't help.

[-] magnue@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

It literally set up about 20-25 services in a week and I'm not experienced with it.

[-] thirdBreakfast@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago
[-] BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Around non-specifically 50% compared to as high as 29.999% doesn't seem like a huge delta. I wonder what the real number on both is.

Edit: Looks like it was 52.4 and 29.1 respectively. The numbers on how much they trust the responses later in the article might be more worrying.

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

That's because you don't understand the numbers. 30% to 50% means it's actually 66% more common for girls.

[-] Barbarossa@piefed.ca 8 points 1 day ago

And with the actual numbers of 52.4% and 29%, its closer to 80% increase in how much women trust the responses. That’s a huge delta, what is driving that

[-] wols@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 day ago

Random uninformed guess: women are on the whole more open to sharing their problems to begin with. So it's probably less "teenage girls turn to AI with their problems while men go to therapy" and more "men continue to avoid talking about their problems to anyone, including LLMs".

It is worrying that social interactions and support are getting delegated to algorithms at such high rates but I'm not convinced there is a significant gender gap to be explained on the technology level. Dudes probably ask the word prediction machine plenty about cars, tech, or weird conspiracy theories.

[-] mynameisbob@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago
this post was submitted on 04 May 2026
156 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

84377 readers
3371 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS