248
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] themurphy@lemmy.world 167 points 1 year ago

What the fuck is wrong with you guys. This is absolutely dystopian shit right there.

This is not "nice" or "neat"?!

It's straight up awful. It's war.

[-] nuke@yah.lol 35 points 1 year ago

A system that can maneuver autonomously is dystopian? Lol, what? This system does NOT fire autonomously

The tank-like robot has the ability to transport itself to a preset destination. It can also spot and avoid obstacles

Source: this article

[-] Zeth0s@lemmy.world 58 points 1 year ago

It is dystopian. It looks like a alpha version of the robocop "bad" robots. It is indeed dystopian. It doesn't fire autonomously just because creators could not implement a "directive 4" (don't shoot who I don't want to be shoot).

[-] nuke@yah.lol 17 points 1 year ago

So automated driving is dystopian? Brace yourself, I have news about self-driving cars

[-] hazelnot 28 points 1 year ago

I have news about them too: they're not actually coming anytime soon, it's all techbro propaganda

I believe that wide adoption of self-driving cars will take a while, but there are already autonomous taxis running around San Francisco

[-] hazelnot 6 points 1 year ago

Yeah, and they keep blocking emergency vehicles in intersections and the whole city wants them gone.

They're prototypes using real human cities as proving grounds without the consent of the population.

[-] Zeth0s@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It is not. Dystopian is an utopia turning bad. There is nothing wrong with AI, it pays my bills. The killing is what turns an utopia to a dystopia. It's people actions and intentions, not technologies

[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 22 points 1 year ago

Dystopian is an utopia turning bad.

It literally is the exact opposite of a utopia, and does not require there to have first ever been a utopia regress into a bad state.

[-] Zeth0s@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
  • AI and autonomous vehicles: utopia
  • AI and autonomous vehicles to kill: dystopian

This is one of the most frustrating thread I've ever partecipated. Why discussions on weapons always turn out like talking to spoilt 4 years old kids.

[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 14 points 1 year ago

Maybe it's frustrating because you have your own, random as fuck definitions for words that nobody else shares.

[-] Zeth0s@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

That's not the reason, but thank for trying guessing. Appreciated

[-] Rogue_General@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago

Hey, for what it's worth I think most people here understand you completely. A killing robot is dystopian, and anyone arguing otherwise is being dense as hell.

[-] Zeth0s@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Thanks :)

It helps!

[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You must not have actually understood him then. He's said this isn't dystopian because it doesn't kill automatically (after also saying it is "alpha dystopian"). It's still dystopian, regardless of whether it can shoot on its own. Every machine of war is.

[-] Zeth0s@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I struggle to understand whether you are trolling. I said this thing is dystopian. It looks like the alpha version of the bad robot from robocop movie

[-] bladerunnerspider@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

"There is nothing wrong with AI, it pays my bills" = "I got mine fuck you"

[-] Zeth0s@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

What do you mean? AI is super helpful, it is doing great things in many fields, including biological research, simplify life of many, supporting and helping people. It is just an umbrella name for many different complex mathematical functions.

Clearly there are bad uses, as any powerful technology. And it is important to highlight them. This is a bad use of AI

[-] bladerunnerspider@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Which altruistic thing is it that the AI that pays your bills does? It appears to me that AI is used for acceleration of war, deceit, and theft and conglomeration of ideas and art with no unique thoughts or perspectives. The people who own the technology will use it to enrich themselves at the expense of those who can not afford it. This is what I mean.

[-] Zeth0s@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Some of the models I built help preventing frauds on customers, i.e. help them keeping their money.

Others support and simplify work of colleagues. There are jobs that are difficult, not pleasant and stressful in my industry, and there is an high demand from people to get help from AI.

I don't know your job, but AI can be very helpful improving quality of life of people in many roles.

BTW AI has been used by artists for years now. I am not talking about generative AI. Photoshop is full of non generative AI tools. Even the spam filters of your email provider are likely nowadays AI.

You should have a deeper look to all enormous variety of AI applications out there

[-] nuke@yah.lol 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The killing

Once again, this system does not kill autonomously. It merely drives autonomously.

[-] Zeth0s@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It is just because it is currently technically impossibile to make it fires the "right" people. So the human will fire the wrong people as liability for human shooting civilians doesn't exist. It is anyway dystopian. As said it is an alpha version of the dystopia.

I really don't get why it is so hard to understand ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[-] Kalcifer@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

One can find interest in an objects technological design while still acknlowledging it's horror when put to practical use. They aren't mutually exclusive options.

[-] prenatal_confusion@lemmy.one 49 points 1 year ago

The tank-like robot has the ability to transport itself to a preset destination. It can also spot and avoid obstacles by utilizing dozens of sensors and an advanced driving system. Moreover, the platform can self-destruct if it falls into enemy hands.

It is not an autonomous weapons system. It is a platform that can maneuver autonomously.

[-] whenigrowup356@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Targeting for the weapon itself is done by a human remotely at least right?

...

...right?

*eta: yeah, it looks like it has a remote driver who can take over the steering and control the gun with a little PS4 controller thingy

[-] redcalcium@lemmy.institute 8 points 1 year ago

How long until there is a version that would let the operator upload a photo of the target and the gun bot would seek and shoot that target automatically, with 99.9% face detection accuracy?

[-] Natanael@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 year ago

Turkey says they have flying drones who already have done that, so ...

[-] wombatula@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

One more step towards the inevitable weapons-free platform that will eventually come.

[-] Dra@lemmy.zip 27 points 1 year ago

Semi-autonomous doesnt really mean anything and is a deliberately sensationalist headline.

The key technological discussion is when it's not a human pulling the trigger.

Even guns are semi autonomous by this definition

[-] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

The tank-like robot has the ability to transport itself to a preset destination. It can also spot and avoid obstacles by utilizing dozens of sensors and an advanced driving system. Moreover, the platform can self-destruct if it falls into enemy hands.

I'd have to assume it has some sort of finding/tracking tech as well to stay on target. Trying to compare this to a handgun is just silly.

[-] Railcar8095@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

The thing is, will it select a target and fire without manual intervention? I'm less worried about it moving autonomously than killing. Not that in this case I think it will make any difference if a civilian enters l encounters it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 21 points 1 year ago

"and prevents risks to human life"... no implications there, I'm sure.

[-] Kalcifer@lemm.ee 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Scary, but neat.

[-] halfmanhalfalligator@feddit.de 17 points 1 year ago
[-] glowie@infosec.pub 4 points 1 year ago

Yes, but more relevant now than then, no?

[-] Norgur@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago

Let's hope that the "AI" doing the aiming was programmed by Microsoft. That way, it would at least not hit anybody....

[-] OldQWERTYbastard@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Guess I'm done talking shit about Clippy.

[-] Norgur@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

It looks like you are trying to violate the Geneva Convention. Would you like help?

  • get help assaulting civilians
  • commit several atrocities from the comfort of your office chair

☐ Do not show this message again

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] IHeartBadCode@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago

A few weeks later.

Aw man, someone coded the routine that checks if the person is from Hamas to always return true. Woopsie Doodle.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Candelestine@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

I was hoping to participate in this conversation with some long, interesting back and forths with different people about this inevitable, emerging technology. Then I scrolled the comments section...

[-] magikmw@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

What is a drone for 500.

[-] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

Here we go. I can't wait for the Boston Dynamics one to be outfitted with a .50 and drone support.

That's going to be totally cool and amazing watching it launch its 300 lb body off stuff all Parkour like 360 no scoping dudes while the drone drops grenades.

/s incase you need it. This is totally going to suck.

[-] uriel238 4 points 1 year ago

If the operators can select targets and the drone locks on and fires, that crosses into a high-risk moral gray-zone, since UIs are susceptible to misclicks and the drone may not consider collateral consequences (such as overpenetration.

If the drone can autonomously target and attack on its own algorithms, add to that the inevitable miscalculations meaning it will eventually kill a target that a soldier would not.

In the meantime anarchists amd revolutionaries should examine how to convice it it's been compromised to convince it to self-destruct.

And if it requires a signal from home to auto-destruct, how to block the affirmative signal.

I suspect the GLA is going to develop thick, sticky smoke bombs and signal jammers to make our ground drone blind and isolated. Then it can be neutralized and salvaged for parts.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2023
248 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59407 readers
2472 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS