339
submitted 14 hours ago by Deep@mander.xyz to c/technology@lemmy.world

It takes most college students at least four years to earn a bachelor’s degree. Christie Williams finished in three months.

The North Carolina human resources executive spent two months racking up credits through web tutorials after work in 2024, then raced through 11 online classes at the University of Maine at Presque Isle in four weeks. Later that year, she went back to earn her master’s – in just five weeks. The two degrees cost a total of just over $4,000.

Since then, she has coached a thousand other students on how to speed through the state college, shaving off years and thousands of dollars from the usual cost of a degree.

“Why wouldn’t you do that?” Williams asked. “It’s kind of a no-brainer if you know about it.”

Many U.S. schools have been experimenting with ways to speed up traditional college programs to reduce the burgeoning cost and help students move into the workforce faster. Some offer three-year bachelor’s programs, reducing the number of credits needed for a diploma by one quarter. Many more allow students to enroll in college classes while still in high school.

But the breakneck pace of the fastest online programs concerns some academics, who say there is a big difference in what students can learn in weeks or months compared with three or more years.

The phenomenon – sometimes referred to as degree hacking, college speed runs or hyperaccelerated degrees – has spawned a cottage industry of influencers making videos about how quickly they earned their degrees and encouraging others to follow suit.

Supporters of the approach tout it as an affordable, convenient way for people to earn credentials they need for their careers. Others, including some online students and academic officials, expressed concern about what the super-accelerated students are missing, and whether a quick path devalues degrees.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

I always say that if you rely on metrics (like does the applicant have a degree or not), you will get people who have optimized for just the metric. It's a lot like paying programs for the bugs they fix. It just doesn't go the way you planned.

[-] Phantom_Engineer@lemmy.world 2 points 44 minutes ago

I've seen some of the videos online. Some degree mills will let you CLEP (and adjacent services) your way to a degree in General Studies (or Liberal Studies, or Multidisciplinary Studies, or whatever). A lot of the time, it's a degree in nothing in particular from a school nobody's heard of. It's not particularly useful, but better than nothing.

You get what you pay for. I'm not sure who is cheating who: the students, who think they've found a way to beat the system, or the schools, who make a quick buck in exchange for a degree of dubious value.

[-] melfie@lemmy.zip 8 points 3 hours ago

I know people who lied about having a degree, could do the job, and never got caught. I suppose speed running a degree from a degree mill yields a similar level of education, except with a piece of paper.

[-] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 hour ago

Can't they fire you if they do somehow find out you don't have a degree?

If that's the case, there may be an actual benefit to the degree mill piece of paper.

[-] SCmSTR 3 points 2 hours ago

Nothing can go wrong

[-] KulunkelBoom@lemmus.org 8 points 3 hours ago

No doctor... we were supposed to remove his appendix - not cut off his balls and dance around with them on a stick while drinking from a beer hard hat.

: /

[-] TrollTrollrolllol@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago
[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

“We can’t make as much money off of them!”

[-] chunes@lemmy.world 53 points 6 hours ago

The part of me that hates credentialism loves this but the part of me that knows how fucking stupid people are hates it.

[-] HexaBack 3 points 3 hours ago

Well said, my thoughts exactly

[-] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 10 points 5 hours ago

Yeah, I wonder how much of this is actual learning vs just gaming the school's systems. And how much of it was just getting an LLM to fake it even more.

[-] Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca 30 points 6 hours ago

I returned to university a decade ago to get a degree. I'm not sure I would trust many of the younger graduates to really understand what they studied. They were very good at memorization and most exams had enough MC questions that they could pass but if they were confronted with written long answer questions, the class average went down dramatically. I can only assume that fully online degrees are of this calibre student. Great at memorization, poor at understanding.

[-] asmoranomar@lemmy.world 1 points 13 minutes ago

Yes, but also on the flip side, I have sat thru classes where the teacher did not know the curriculum and I had to explain things to the students. I also built the infrastructure for a computer lab and then had classes in that very lab. When the teacher couldn't set up the conditions for a test, they consulted me to troubleshoot it (in this case, the teacher was not at fault, it was the equipment).

I tried to CLEP, but most of the time (for me) i failed many because I was either bad at the test, covered material that I was never taught, or the course could not be CLEP. The annoying thing is that in almost every case, there was stuff that wasn't in the CLEP that I was taught, or vice versa after taking the course.

If the course doesn't teach you to understand, then the metric being measured is not "understanding".

[-] FallenGrove@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

The long answer questions were always my favorite in school because I suck at memorization. I can explain a concept well, but never pick the correct answer out of a list because it wasn't my version of the answer.

[-] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 15 points 6 hours ago

That's the kind of student that grade focused test prep "education" systems are designed to provide.

[-] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 19 points 7 hours ago

I've already spent more than 4 years in college with little to show for it. If speed-running college to get that piece of paper at the end is what it takes. more power to them.

[-] Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca 7 points 4 hours ago

I can see that, if you think that just getting the paper is enough. It is contrary to the idea that university was a place to learn how to learn and gain knowledge that could then be used in your life. Undergrads didn't lead to employment, they led to further career or education opportunities. If all a diploma mill generates is slips of paper without the student gaining knowledge, even $4000 is a gross overpayment.

[-] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 hours ago

it's not that getting the piece of paper is enough as much as it has become a minimum standard for gaining jobs that frankly-shouldn't require it. The guy that has "some college experience" looks the same in the eyes of the employer as the guy who never went to college, because they don't have a piece of paper.

[-] leriotdelac@lemmy.zip 68 points 9 hours ago

I can only applaud people who do that in the US: the cost of education is outrageous.

Here in Germany people prolong their education by years, since it's almost free, you can work part-time, and there's no need to rush.

If the US system won't be robbing young people of hundreds thousands dollars, they wouldn't feel compelled to try and hack the system.

[-] Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world 29 points 8 hours ago

State funded adult education seems like a really sensible investment in the future. I'm in my 50s, never did a degree - wasn't really interested when I was younger. But I'd love to have the opportunity to study now. Can't afford it, though.

[-] MDCCCLV@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 hours ago

Certificates and goal based stuff is more useful than a generic paper degree.

Oh yeah, I agree. I'm just saying that now that I'm later on in life I have a clearer idea of my interests and an actual desire to learn, as opposed to when I was of 'university age'. Back then I was only into sex, drugs, and techno. The opportunity was wasted.

[-] HAL_9_TRILLION@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Everything you said is absolutely true and thoroughly shit. It's just a shame that the system's solution is to now rob them of an actual education as well.

The only thing keeping America on any kind of footing at all is that exposure to classical education largely deprograms the religious bullshit most American kids grow up with. Oh, and it actually educates them, as opposed to whatever AI assisted bullshit "workers" this is going to end up giving us.

Edit: although... religion is dying here anyway, so optimistically, maybe kids these days will need the deprogramming less and AI will improve dramatically. We could theoretically end up with a net benefit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] yeahiknow3@lemmy.dbzer0.com 41 points 10 hours ago

Completely lost sight of the purpose of education, which has nothing to do with being an effective corporate drone… unless you get a business degree, in which case 4 weeks is too long.

[-] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 7 points 6 hours ago

It's been gone for a long time. “They literally just need a certificate” sums up the whole point of the education system as it actually operates, not the fantasy version we wish it was

[-] yeahiknow3@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

There is no “fantasy,” just indifference. I have no clue what everyone else is doing, but I didn’t fight my way from homelessness and into college “to get a job.”

[-] bilb@lemmy.ml 5 points 6 hours ago

People like saying lately "the purpose of a system is what is does" or something like that, so if we're being realistic here you're on to something.

[-] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 3 points 6 hours ago

Pretty much. I'm totally disillusioned with the education system and I want something totally diffrent

[-] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 8 points 9 hours ago

The point of paying for a college degree is to get a job. Education can be done for free, or the coat of printing out pirated textbooks at most. We don't need institutions to learn

[-] MDCCCLV@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 hours ago

You kinda do for hard stuff. There's lots of stuff where just reading a book isn't enough to learn the material.

[-] yeahiknow3@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

For your own sake, I hope you don’t actually believe this.

EDIT: seriously, other people and cultures can’t dictate your purpose for doing anything.

[-] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 4 points 6 hours ago

I like the concept but got burned hard by my experience going last decade. It's way too expensive to just go for self enrichment. If you have motivation you can teach yourself. It's never been easier, and you could hire a tutor to help you through at places for a tiny fraction of the price. Big institutions generally are breaking down and not working right.

[-] yeahiknow3@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 hours ago

When conservatives say that folks can teach themselves they’re hoping for the exact opposite.

Because not everyone can “teach themselves.” In fact, almost nobody can, otherwise we’d all be geniuses and not a bunch of dumb apes.

[-] Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml 4 points 7 hours ago

They're right, cry about it

[-] UnpopularCrow@lemmy.world 177 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

If you can complete a masters degree in five weeks, it’s a degree mill and not a real degree. The average in-person masters degree requires 30 credit hours with 24 credits being above 500 level (graduate classes). Let’s do the math:

If you take 15 credits per semester (5 classes typically), that would be 15 hours of class time for 12 weeks. For a 3 credit class this would be 3 hours per week of class time. If you condense this down to 5 weeks, that would be 36 hours of class time per week for five weeks.

But remember, this is only half the required credits. So you have to multiply this by 2, leading to 72 hours per week of just class time.

This does NOT include any outside work. Typically, 500 level classes give homework that can take 5-10 hours per week since it is a graduate level class. Let’s assume five hours to be generous.

That would mean for a full semester (15 credit hours at 5 classes) one would be looking at 15 hours of class work per week plus 25 hours of homework/projects per week (5 classes x 5 hours of work per class). For a total of 40 hours per week.

Condensing this down to 5 weeks would multiple this number by 2.4 (5 weeks instead of 12 weeks). And then multiplying it again by 2 since you would have to do both semesters in five weeks. That would be 192 hours of work per week for five weeks. There are 144 hours in a week. These places are degree mills.

[-] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 4 hours ago

But, but, if... degree mills exist... then...

Recruiters would have to do actual work, to vet that!

Clearly you haven't been on LinkedIn enough to understand how the job market actually works.

[-] Soggy@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

Same way it's always worked. Your best shot is by knowing someone in the field who can get you in the door for an interview.

[-] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 hours ago

But you don't understand, we live in a meritocracy that rewards hard work and skill!

[-] Know_not_Scotty_does@lemmy.world 84 points 14 hours ago

I did a summer "mini-mester" for my undergrad Fluid Mechanics class where the class was condensed into 4 or 6 weeks but you met every day and it was FUCKING BRUTAL even though I was only doing that one course. I can't imagine doing that for a full 15hrs of coursework. This smells more like a click through the classwork once randomly, figure out the right answers from the online quiz when they pop up at the end, then click the right answers the next time type of situation but for a whole program.

How this got accredited (if it actually is) is beyond me.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[-] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 21 points 10 hours ago

I'm of two minds about this. So many jobs out there require a college degree when the work itself doesn't really require a college degree to do. People who can't afford to go to college but are able to do the work are locked out of that more comfortable life. This makes it easier to get that foot in the door.

At the same time, you learn A LOT about life and people in those 3 or 4 years at college. It's a shame for someone to miss out on that experience. Also, this speed run absolutely could not work for a STEM degree.

[-] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 3 points 6 hours ago

There should be regulations on what degrees and certificates employers can ask for, and costs for those degrees should be imposed on employers who demand them

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2026
339 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

83963 readers
2838 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS