207
submitted 2 months ago by Zerush@lemmy.ml to c/technology@lemmy.ml
all 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Mihies@programming.dev 36 points 2 months ago

As an EU citizen I'd say this should be a wakeup call to push for an alternative and open OS.

[-] Zerush@lemmy.ml 13 points 2 months ago

Fairphone with Linage or e/OS, the best EU alternatives

[-] atopi@piefed.blahaj.zone 19 points 2 months ago

i have a feeling android is not the best alternative to android

[-] Zerush@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

That is nonsense, Android is OpenSource, based on Linux, adapted to mobile, but with APIs controlled by Google, Linage, e/OS, Ubuntu Touch, etc...... are other distros of Linux for Mobile, compatible with Android apps. There Google can do nothing to avoid the use of not approved apps, like it can do it in Android due it's inbuild APIs and banning those from Google Play, which other OS don't have or use. Because of this I also don't like GrapheneOS, because it works only on Google Phones, which can block apps on HW base if Google want it. In other Phones, eg.FairPhone with own idependent OS, there Google see only the middle finger.

[-] eldavi@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 months ago

i get the feeling that both lineage and graphene are only temporary measures; locking down android is only the first step and google will push for further lockdown eventually.

[-] quick_snail@feddit.nl 1 points 2 months ago

They literally have no power over the ROMs lol

[-] eldavi@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

the phone makers do and they'll do whatever google wants them to do.

[-] quick_snail@feddit.nl 1 points 1 month ago

Nope. Just reinstall the OS. It's no different than laptops

[-] eldavi@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

but it's got A LOT caveats compared to normal bios based systems and many manufacturers are locking them down.

[-] onlooker@lemmy.ml 30 points 2 months ago

What this basically is is signees asking Google to fix the problem that Google itself caused. I hope for other people's sake that this goes through, but since we're talking about Google, I am all but convinced that Google will pull something like this again in the future.

[-] slampisko@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Yeah I'm not holding my breath for this letter to do anything. I also find it funny that many projects among the signatures are probably the reasons for Google to be doing this in the first place (like FUTO, makers of GrayJay) since it could be argued that they are costing Google revenue and that's ultimately what they care about.

[-] jaykrown@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

You don't need Google's permission to host your own web application. Browsers and the internet are awesome. The Google play store is a nuisance and I look forward to the day when I can have a Linux distribution running on my phone with everything I need.

[-] quick_snail@feddit.nl 1 points 2 months ago

Eh, good riddance to gapps

this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2026
207 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

42543 readers
102 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS